New Posts For Thread: Signature Spells: Original Interpretation vs What We Gothttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29476809/Signature_Spells:_Original_Interpretation_vs_What_We_GotOkay so we got Signature Spells for Wizard Traditions now. I like the idea, not so much the current implementation.My original interpretation was that you could regain a Tradition appropriate spell of each spell level, a la Encounter power. Example bI don't think it was a necessarily better system, Uriel, it was just a lot more fun and balanced than a lot of the anti-4e people always say it is. The packets before this one have showed that Vancian casting doesn't necessarily have to be broken, anhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29476809/Signature_Spells:_Original_Interpretation_vs_What_We_Got?post_id=525866565#525866565I don't think it was a necessarily better system, Uriel, it was just a lot more fun and balanced than a lot of the anti-4e people always say it is. The packets before this one have showed that Vancian casting doesn't necessarily have to be broken, anWed, 07 Nov 2012 15:45:28 -0600It was a better system all around. Everybody had their big hurrah for the day, everbody had something they could do after taking a breather and a few things they could do all the time. i rather liked having a non-anemic character at 4th level. Plahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29476809/Signature_Spells:_Original_Interpretation_vs_What_We_Got?post_id=525864359#525864359It was a better system all around. Everybody had their big hurrah for the day, everbody had something they could do after taking a breather and a few things they could do all the time. i rather liked having a non-anemic character at 4th level. PlaWed, 07 Nov 2012 14:51:51 -0600Then what, pray tell, IS the "theme of [the] game"? I thought it was supposed to be an edition for fans of all editions. Why would having something from 4E be blasphemy?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29476809/Signature_Spells:_Original_Interpretation_vs_What_We_Got?post_id=525800669#525800669Then what, pray tell, IS the "theme of [the] game"? I thought it was supposed to be an edition for fans of all editions. Why would having something from 4E be blasphemy?Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:20:19 -0600Your thinking of cool fluff stuff, kudos! But most of the play test seems to be crunch related.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29476809/Signature_Spells:_Original_Interpretation_vs_What_We_Got?post_id=525792949#525792949Your thinking of cool fluff stuff, kudos! But most of the play test seems to be crunch related.Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:58:23 -0600In my opinion they missed the point of signiture spells completely. A signature spell is supposed to be a spell that is a Wizards trademark. So it should be chosen by the wizard and it should be modified from its original version. Such as Magic Missihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29476809/Signature_Spells:_Original_Interpretation_vs_What_We_Got?post_id=525792845#525792845In my opinion they missed the point of signiture spells completely. A signature spell is supposed to be a spell that is a Wizards trademark. So it should be chosen by the wizard and it should be modified from its original version. Such as Magic MissiMon, 05 Nov 2012 07:52:37 -0600