<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: It happened earlier than we thought</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29471433/It_happened_earlier_than_we_thought</link><description>From Lisa Stevens, Paizo CEO.  Happened after a year of existence. Pretty impressive!</description><item><title>I didn't ment best selling edition, just that it outsold PF. The best selling edition was probably 1st when DnD was the most popular or maybe 2e, in terms of volume.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29471433/It_happened_earlier_than_we_thought?post_id=526396703#526396703</link><description>I didn't ment best selling edition, just that it outsold PF. The best selling edition was probably 1st when DnD was the most popular or maybe 2e, in terms of volume.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:08:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't believe he said that 4e was the best selling edition. I feel 4e was the best edition of D&amp;D, but quality and economics are not the same.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29471433/It_happened_earlier_than_we_thought?post_id=526393805#526393805</link><description>I don't believe he said that 4e was the best selling edition. I feel 4e was the best edition of D&amp;D, but quality and economics are not the same.</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:08:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Of course, but you also think 4e was the best edition of DnD and thus the best seller. Certainly would affect your perception, wouldn't it?But: 1) She does say it took a while for a careful magazine industry to say what she (and probably WotC staff)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29471433/It_happened_earlier_than_we_thought?post_id=526370853#526370853</link><description>Of course, but you also think 4e was the best edition of DnD and thus the best seller. Certainly would affect your perception, wouldn't it?But: 1) She does say it took a while for a careful magazine industry to say what she (and probably WotC staff)</description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:49:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The sales stats released in the industry standard trade magazine does not back up her claim. There is no evidence to support what she is saying. It might be true, but she might also be overestimating/overstating the game&#x92;s success. People tend</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29471433/It_happened_earlier_than_we_thought?post_id=526341239#526341239</link><description>The sales stats released in the industry standard trade magazine does not back up her claim. There is no evidence to support what she is saying. It might be true, but she might also be overestimating/overstating the game&#x92;s success. People tend</description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:16:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think they are definitely responsible for their continued success. I was just pointing out that there was a huge market already existing for the Pathfinder game to lead. They've led it well. I would say that my point is more specifically that Pathf</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29471433/It_happened_earlier_than_we_thought?post_id=526126703#526126703</link><description>I think they are definitely responsible for their continued success. I was just pointing out that there was a huge market already existing for the Pathfinder game to lead. They've led it well. I would say that my point is more specifically that Pathf</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:57:25 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
