<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Artificer Resistive Formula Infusion - Free Action - Timing</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29467327/Artificer_Resistive_Formula_Infusion_-_Free_Action_-_Timing</link><description>Say a character has the Artificer "Resistive Formula Infusion" on him: "The target can end the [Infusion] as a free action to gain temporary hit points..."  Say that character is attacked, the attacker rolls to hit, hits and then rolls for damage aga</description><item><title>Interrupt jumps in when an action occurs, taking place before it finishes, among other things.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29467327/Artificer_Resistive_Formula_Infusion_-_Free_Action_-_Timing?post_id=525709885#525709885</link><description>Interrupt jumps in when an action occurs, taking place before it finishes, among other things.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:43:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Alcestis, they're using the 'common' meaning of the word interrupt, which is the source of the discrepancy.  If you do something that makes an attack in progress not happen, it's not unreasonable to call that 'interrupting the attack.'  It may be imp</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29467327/Artificer_Resistive_Formula_Infusion_-_Free_Action_-_Timing?post_id=525707851#525707851</link><description>Alcestis, they're using the 'common' meaning of the word interrupt, which is the source of the discrepancy.  If you do something that makes an attack in progress not happen, it's not unreasonable to call that 'interrupting the attack.'  It may be imp</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:40:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Again, you don't understand the rules. Interrupts invalidate the entire action if they they invalidate their trigger. That isn't happening here, even if you allow the free action to resolve between steps of an attack.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29467327/Artificer_Resistive_Formula_Infusion_-_Free_Action_-_Timing?post_id=525706289#525706289</link><description>Again, you don't understand the rules. Interrupts invalidate the entire action if they they invalidate their trigger. That isn't happening here, even if you allow the free action to resolve between steps of an attack.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:46:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No, it isn't. And saying so just proves you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the rules.[/quote]From the italicized and bolded portions of the OP, I understand exactly what he was asking, and it does kind of boil down to Free Actions interruptin</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29467327/Artificer_Resistive_Formula_Infusion_-_Free_Action_-_Timing?post_id=525704259#525704259</link><description>No, it isn't. And saying so just proves you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the rules.[/quote]From the italicized and bolded portions of the OP, I understand exactly what he was asking, and it does kind of boil down to Free Actions interruptin</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:32:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Munchkin fallacy.[/quote]Hah, have you even listened to your own argument? You keep saying that the rules say Free Actions can be used at any time and that the rules would need to tell you when you can't use them; not only does that first rule not ex</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29467327/Artificer_Resistive_Formula_Infusion_-_Free_Action_-_Timing?post_id=525699675#525699675</link><description>Munchkin fallacy.[/quote]Hah, have you even listened to your own argument? You keep saying that the rules say Free Actions can be used at any time and that the rules would need to tell you when you can't use them; not only does that first rule not ex</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 05:01:52 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
