<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: WotC RPG Setting Books</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29456799/WotC_RPG_Setting_Books</link><description>So I made this thread, mostly for any Devs to see, and it made me think:I want setting books that are high in setting content and low (or nonexistant) in game mechanics.WotC owns the rights to other interesting settings besides the Forgotten Realms.I</description><item><title>The only way I'd consider buying 5e if WotC pusblishes an adventure path in Planescape, city-based.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29456799/WotC_RPG_Setting_Books?post_id=525638961#525638961</link><description>The only way I'd consider buying 5e if WotC pusblishes an adventure path in Planescape, city-based.</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:24:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't entirely disagree.The Adventures are Key. That's what makes Paizo's Golarion so appealing.I would love to see them actually do something useful with their Non Forgotten Realms settings again. If they started releasing some good planescape adv</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29456799/WotC_RPG_Setting_Books?post_id=525623133#525623133</link><description>I don't entirely disagree.The Adventures are Key. That's what makes Paizo's Golarion so appealing.I would love to see them actually do something useful with their Non Forgotten Realms settings again. If they started releasing some good planescape adv</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:02:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In offering a different perspective, I would argue that (based on my own anecdotal evidence) that players around here are pretty burned out by the Realms. It's not that the changes bothered them, but that's all we're really getting from WotC anymore.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29456799/WotC_RPG_Setting_Books?post_id=525478263#525478263</link><description>In offering a different perspective, I would argue that (based on my own anecdotal evidence) that players around here are pretty burned out by the Realms. It's not that the changes bothered them, but that's all we're really getting from WotC anymore.</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:44:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Menzoberranzan and Ed's Realms don't add anything to the players. That's true.They aren't designed for the player. They're designed for the GM.If you're a GM and you want to run a Drow Game? Menzoberranzan is amazingly useful. It includes a good prim</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29456799/WotC_RPG_Setting_Books?post_id=525446813#525446813</link><description>Menzoberranzan and Ed's Realms don't add anything to the players. That's true.They aren't designed for the player. They're designed for the GM.If you're a GM and you want to run a Drow Game? Menzoberranzan is amazingly useful. It includes a good prim</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:39:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Menzo and Ed's book doesn't add anything to 4e player, they are such a small niche to the point of being insignificant...About characters personality being what the fun is...i prefer to have a fun character to RP and to also having it being fun t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29456799/WotC_RPG_Setting_Books?post_id=525445945#525445945</link><description>The Menzo and Ed's book doesn't add anything to 4e player, they are such a small niche to the point of being insignificant...About characters personality being what the fun is...i prefer to have a fun character to RP and to also having it being fun t</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:25:48 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
