<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Magic Items are exciting again?!</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29422393/Magic_Items_are_exciting_again!</link><description>A quote from L&amp;L article today on magic items.Items being unique to adventures again! That sounds amazing. Is anyone else totally stoked about how they are taking magic items back to a 1e and 2e feel?</description><item><title>Personally when I run the new system I'm going to house-rule out all the +x items.  Magic items should do something cool not just give you a extra + on your sheet.  But sense +x will always be better than in combat than all the cool items because the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29422393/Magic_Items_are_exciting_again!?post_id=525600487#525600487</link><description>Personally when I run the new system I'm going to house-rule out all the +x items.  Magic items should do something cool not just give you a extra + on your sheet.  But sense +x will always be better than in combat than all the cool items because the</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:59:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I see a few... overlooked facts in many of these discussions about magic items1) many people are terrified of what will happen if a +3 or higher weapon gets into players hands, along with other items like belts of giant strength. Now I might have mis</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29422393/Magic_Items_are_exciting_again!?post_id=525557065#525557065</link><description>I see a few... overlooked facts in many of these discussions about magic items1) many people are terrified of what will happen if a +3 or higher weapon gets into players hands, along with other items like belts of giant strength. Now I might have mis</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:40:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>.....Are you purposefully not reading what I'm writing?The entire point is that the guidance on how to use them is essential.  Of course without it things fall apart.  That's why we're emphasizing just how much it needs to be in.If you ignore half of</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29422393/Magic_Items_are_exciting_again!?post_id=525546311#525546311</link><description>.....Are you purposefully not reading what I'm writing?The entire point is that the guidance on how to use them is essential.  Of course without it things fall apart.  That's why we're emphasizing just how much it needs to be in.If you ignore half of</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:39:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Your logic fail is.................amazing.  Unbalanced does not equal random.  If I create a +25 sword, it is extremely unbalanced.  It is also completely and utterly as I intended with not a hint of random anywhere in it.Yay!  More great logic fail</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29422393/Magic_Items_are_exciting_again!?post_id=525546213#525546213</link><description>Your logic fail is.................amazing.  Unbalanced does not equal random.  If I create a +25 sword, it is extremely unbalanced.  It is also completely and utterly as I intended with not a hint of random anywhere in it.Yay!  More great logic fail</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:38:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>.....Are you purposefully not reading what I'm writing?The entire point is that the guidance on how to use them is essential.  Of course without it things fall apart.  That's why we're emphasizing just how much it needs to be in.If you ignore half of</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29422393/Magic_Items_are_exciting_again!?post_id=525545389#525545389</link><description>.....Are you purposefully not reading what I'm writing?The entire point is that the guidance on how to use them is essential.  Of course without it things fall apart.  That's why we're emphasizing just how much it needs to be in.If you ignore half of</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:13:48 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
