<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: I really like the experimental rule for Magic Item Attunement</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29421925/I_really_like_the_experimental_rule_for_Magic_Item_Attunement</link><description>If you aren't sure it's page 4 in the Experimental Rule box under Attunement in the Magic Item document.I really, really do like it. It makes charisma more important. If you are binding the magic to your will it makes quite a bit of sense.Although a</description><item><title>I am really sure it' s not in a final form.  In fact it' s the first iteration available for rigorous playtesting.  Give it a couple of years before expecting a final version.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29421925/I_really_like_the_experimental_rule_for_Magic_Item_Attunement?post_id=524951099#524951099</link><description>I am really sure it' s not in a final form.  In fact it' s the first iteration available for rigorous playtesting.  Give it a couple of years before expecting a final version.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:55:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't hate this idea, I'm not sure it's in a final form that would be appropriate for most gmaes, but it's going somewhere and I'm intersted in seeing where that is.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29421925/I_really_like_the_experimental_rule_for_Magic_Item_Attunement?post_id=524944835#524944835</link><description>I don't hate this idea, I'm not sure it's in a final form that would be appropriate for most gmaes, but it's going somewhere and I'm intersted in seeing where that is.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:53:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I like attunement, not becase it is a balancing mechanism, but because it a mechanic that supports stories, such stories of discovering the greater magical potential in an item, through slow discovery.  For example discovering that nifty +1 sword is</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29421925/I_really_like_the_experimental_rule_for_Magic_Item_Attunement?post_id=524941379#524941379</link><description>I like attunement, not becase it is a balancing mechanism, but because it a mechanic that supports stories, such stories of discovering the greater magical potential in an item, through slow discovery.  For example discovering that nifty +1 sword is</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:18:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No. This is one of the main purposes of Constitution. My point was that giving Charisma a large buff like 'more magic items' might be unfair, while giving it 'One more magic item 15% of the time' would be less unfair.I'm not saying it is or isn't a g</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29421925/I_really_like_the_experimental_rule_for_Magic_Item_Attunement?post_id=524941079#524941079</link><description>No. This is one of the main purposes of Constitution. My point was that giving Charisma a large buff like 'more magic items' might be unfair, while giving it 'One more magic item 15% of the time' would be less unfair.I'm not saying it is or isn't a g</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:43:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The rules also say that you can only have no more than 3 items attuned to a single character at one time. The one that says up to your Charisma bonus is an experimental rule, not a set one. You don't have to use the rule for Charisma bonus should you</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29421925/I_really_like_the_experimental_rule_for_Magic_Item_Attunement?post_id=524941053#524941053</link><description>The rules also say that you can only have no more than 3 items attuned to a single character at one time. The one that says up to your Charisma bonus is an experimental rule, not a set one. You don't have to use the rule for Charisma bonus should you</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:38:12 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
