New Posts For Thread: The excitement of the good old days of 4ehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29420135/The_excitement_of_the_good_old_days_of_4eAnyone who was around for the launch of 4e might remember this article. Spellcasters getting critical hits? Fixed defenses instead of rolled saves? It kinda brings back the old tingle, the promise of something new and something exciting.I find it intI have to say, I do like the idea of how HP in DDN works. I want Arcane Power 2, Divine Power 2, and Primal Power 2 though for 4e....http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29420135/The_excitement_of_the_good_old_days_of_4e?post_id=526247329#526247329I have to say, I do like the idea of how HP in DDN works. I want Arcane Power 2, Divine Power 2, and Primal Power 2 though for 4e....Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:51:03 -0600Other way around. IIRC rangers wer ethe onl class in 1st ed who could dual wield as a core mechanic. 2nd ed at least had it as an exlcusive rnager ability. 3.0 was the first edition where other classes apart form the ranger could dual wield in thecorhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29420135/The_excitement_of_the_good_old_days_of_4e?post_id=525995311#525995311Other way around. IIRC rangers wer ethe onl class in 1st ed who could dual wield as a core mechanic. 2nd ed at least had it as an exlcusive rnager ability. 3.0 was the first edition where other classes apart form the ranger could dual wield in thecorSun, 11 Nov 2012 21:35:17 -0600Other way around. IIRC rangers wer ethe onl class in 1st ed who could dual wield as a core mechanic. 2nd ed at least had it as an exlcusive rnager ability. 3.0 was the first edition where other classes apart form the ranger could dual wield in thecorhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29420135/The_excitement_of_the_good_old_days_of_4e?post_id=525934559#525934559Other way around. IIRC rangers wer ethe onl class in 1st ed who could dual wield as a core mechanic. 2nd ed at least had it as an exlcusive rnager ability. 3.0 was the first edition where other classes apart form the ranger could dual wield in thecorFri, 09 Nov 2012 22:15:56 -0600Yeah, I'd imagine a Drow TBF ranger would pretty much exactly cover it. You might perhaps need a theme somewhere in there or a PP/ED of whatever sorts to add in something or other but honestly I don't think I've ever read the novels... lol. I have tohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29420135/The_excitement_of_the_good_old_days_of_4e?post_id=525934499#525934499Yeah, I'd imagine a Drow TBF ranger would pretty much exactly cover it. You might perhaps need a theme somewhere in there or a PP/ED of whatever sorts to add in something or other but honestly I don't think I've ever read the novels... lol. I have toFri, 09 Nov 2012 22:08:42 -0600to be fair, two-blade ranger in fourth edition fits him to a T - so while he officially might be a monster or whatever, he would likely be best designed in 4th (although i might be wrong here, but i think the two blade ranegr was heavily inspired byhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29420135/The_excitement_of_the_good_old_days_of_4e?post_id=525929565#525929565to be fair, two-blade ranger in fourth edition fits him to a T - so while he officially might be a monster or whatever, he would likely be best designed in 4th (although i might be wrong here, but i think the two blade ranegr was heavily inspired byFri, 09 Nov 2012 17:27:23 -0600