<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Poll:  Monster Block Layout</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29402997/Poll:__Monster_Block_Layout</link><description>Which do you prefer?A) Full, Verbose Text.An Ooze has no set form, which allows it to squeeze though small openings without penalties and cannot be knocked prone.B) Short, Codified TextImmunity: Prone, squeezing (formless)C) Somewhere in betweenTrait</description><item><title>See, this is a reason why I like it. Specifically because it provides the opportunity to muddy the waters and give more room to interpret. I'd like to get away from all mechanics boiled down to keywords and add more flexibility to creatures (as well</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29402997/Poll:__Monster_Block_Layout?post_id=524693431#524693431</link><description>See, this is a reason why I like it. Specifically because it provides the opportunity to muddy the waters and give more room to interpret. I'd like to get away from all mechanics boiled down to keywords and add more flexibility to creatures (as well</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:53:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In an Adventure: BIn the MM: D</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29402997/Poll:__Monster_Block_Layout?post_id=524693005#524693005</link><description>In an Adventure: BIn the MM: D</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:40:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>D! My only reservation about it is that there is potential convolutedness that might arise because of so much text. However, if the fluff can be kept brief enough to not bog things down I would be quite pleased.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29402997/Poll:__Monster_Block_Layout?post_id=524692951#524692951</link><description>D! My only reservation about it is that there is potential convolutedness that might arise because of so much text. However, if the fluff can be kept brief enough to not bog things down I would be quite pleased.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:38:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>B, no questions about it. I like to read things at a glance when running.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29402997/Poll:__Monster_Block_Layout?post_id=524686507#524686507</link><description>B, no questions about it. I like to read things at a glance when running.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:25:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The 2e MM descriptions, for the most part, are no longer than the descriptions for more recent editions, and generally contain significantly less actual description because they're bloated with raw mechanical information that more recent editions wou</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29402997/Poll:__Monster_Block_Layout?post_id=524681391#524681391</link><description>The 2e MM descriptions, for the most part, are no longer than the descriptions for more recent editions, and generally contain significantly less actual description because they're bloated with raw mechanical information that more recent editions wou</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 06:14:04 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
