<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 5E Manual of the Planes</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29370447/5E_Manual_of_the_Planes</link><description>Before 4E, we had the Great Wheel cosmology with eleventy-hundred planes to explore. 4E did a lot of swooping changes and condensed them down to the World Axis cosmology. I realize it's a bit soon in the playtest phase to be worrying too much about p</description><item><title>Good call. It was short, but an excellent read! I believe this quote from Chris Perkins sums it up nicely: I know some were saying "Just because they plan to do it doesn't mean they will", but this looks like they both plan to do it and will do it. I</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29370447/5E_Manual_of_the_Planes?post_id=524030845#524030845</link><description>Good call. It was short, but an excellent read! I believe this quote from Chris Perkins sums it up nicely: I know some were saying "Just because they plan to do it doesn't mean they will", but this looks like they both plan to do it and will do it. I</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:18:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think Wrecan is talking about this article:www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/d...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29370447/5E_Manual_of_the_Planes?post_id=524017745#524017745</link><description>I think Wrecan is talking about this article:www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/d...</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:33:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This idea is bad ass! Which seminar was it in? I ask so that I can listen to it. I really hope they follow through with the idea wrecan mentioned. I think this could satisfy many players, much more so than releasing one or the other.I've always playe</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29370447/5E_Manual_of_the_Planes?post_id=524015439#524015439</link><description>This idea is bad ass! Which seminar was it in? I ask so that I can listen to it. I really hope they follow through with the idea wrecan mentioned. I think this could satisfy many players, much more so than releasing one or the other.I've always playe</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:25:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>To me the most important is that each campaign has the cosmolegy that best suits the campign setting.Take for example dragonlance there is hardly any mention of tha planed at all.also for people trying to fit the shadowfell and faywild into the big w</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29370447/5E_Manual_of_the_Planes?post_id=523996761#523996761</link><description>To me the most important is that each campaign has the cosmolegy that best suits the campign setting.Take for example dragonlance there is hardly any mention of tha planed at all.also for people trying to fit the shadowfell and faywild into the big w</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:18:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If you can't go there and do stuff ... why bother including it at all?[/quote]It's where things come from.  It's a place of refuge that those things go to.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29370447/5E_Manual_of_the_Planes?post_id=523996705#523996705</link><description>If you can't go there and do stuff ... why bother including it at all?[/quote]It's where things come from.  It's a place of refuge that those things go to.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:17:01 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
