New Posts For Thread: The sorcererhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29340593/The_sorcererI've noticed recently that we have threads talking about how the sorcerer is overpowered and others about how it's underpowered. How about we just look at the fact that IT'S A DIFFERENT CLASS!All i am reading is "how dare they make something with a uI've seen some very nitpicky arguements, for this one, probably they would argue that it does not say the spell dissipates after you connect and make your attack, and increasing your strength for a full minute, but losing it if you decide to hit a crhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29340593/The_sorcerer?post_id=524116147#524116147I've seen some very nitpicky arguements, for this one, probably they would argue that it does not say the spell dissipates after you connect and make your attack, and increasing your strength for a full minute, but losing it if you decide to hit a crFri, 14 Sep 2012 01:57:33 -0500im sorry but how could you possibly see that any other way?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29340593/The_sorcerer?post_id=524110759#524110759im sorry but how could you possibly see that any other way?Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:42:56 -0500Yeah, I thoughgt so at first but the more I look at it it seems poorly worded. It does say the next time you hit within a minute. I could see an arguement either way, but it probably is supposed to be only one attackhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29340593/The_sorcerer?post_id=524092839#524092839Yeah, I thoughgt so at first but the more I look at it it seems poorly worded. It does say the next time you hit within a minute. I could see an arguement either way, but it probably is supposed to be only one attackThu, 13 Sep 2012 10:02:59 -0500dragon strength is for the next attack within a minutehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29340593/The_sorcerer?post_id=524085371#524085371dragon strength is for the next attack within a minuteThu, 13 Sep 2012 04:22:37 -0500I don't understand how you're using the word "deduce." To me, that means I'm trying to guess what spell someone is casting based on its components. Like, if I saw someone casting a spell, I could deduce that it was Fireball.And that's already coverhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29340593/The_sorcerer?post_id=524083149#524083149I don't understand how you're using the word "deduce." To me, that means I'm trying to guess what spell someone is casting based on its components. Like, if I saw someone casting a spell, I could deduce that it was Fireball.And that's already coverThu, 13 Sep 2012 00:37:11 -0500