New Posts For Thread: Dungeon Command: So, so close to buying, but won'thttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29257333/Dungeon_Command:_So,_so_close_to_buying,_but_wontJust got done reading the rules, and found one thing incomprehinsible. I thought I must have read it wrong, so I came here to check it out, but sadly it turns out to be true.The rules make it possible-- even probable-- that someone who is willing toSo you want 4 arcane portals and 0 invigorating smashes, just so you can get a full playset of Arcane Portals out of 2 boxes? ;)There are precious few cards I find myself wanting 4 of, as most cards are only going to get used in conditional circumstahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29257333/Dungeon_Command:_So,_so_close_to_buying,_but_wont?post_id=522705943#522705943So you want 4 arcane portals and 0 invigorating smashes, just so you can get a full playset of Arcane Portals out of 2 boxes? ;)There are precious few cards I find myself wanting 4 of, as most cards are only going to get used in conditional circumstaMon, 06 Aug 2012 18:02:58 -0500To offer a little support for the OP, I do feel that Wizards droped the ball just a bit. I would have been much happier if they had made the custom design rules in such a way that buying 2 of any faction pack would meet the requirements. I would havhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29257333/Dungeon_Command:_So,_so_close_to_buying,_but_wont?post_id=522702113#522702113To offer a little support for the OP, I do feel that Wizards droped the ball just a bit. I would have been much happier if they had made the custom design rules in such a way that buying 2 of any faction pack would meet the requirements. I would havMon, 06 Aug 2012 16:10:51 -0500FWIW, I'll eat a little crow here.I still find the distribution model just as offensive as I made it out to be. I stand by everything I said about that.However, after seeing some people playing at the local game store, I will now grant that allowinghttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29257333/Dungeon_Command:_So,_so_close_to_buying,_but_wont?post_id=522654263#522654263FWIW, I'll eat a little crow here.I still find the distribution model just as offensive as I made it out to be. I stand by everything I said about that.However, after seeing some people playing at the local game store, I will now grant that allowingSun, 05 Aug 2012 14:28:04 -0500Nope. I ordered an additional Order Deck and map tiles for each faction, and the total came to $13.50 (including shipping). And that's what I received.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29257333/Dungeon_Command:_So,_so_close_to_buying,_but_wont?post_id=522596479#522596479Nope. I ordered an additional Order Deck and map tiles for each faction, and the total came to $13.50 (including shipping). And that's what I received.Sat, 04 Aug 2012 03:46:35 -0500Second place in a Realms, two DMF top 8s, invites to National Championship and Worlds, four Spectral Tigers won total.Yeah, I'm familiar with it. Dice pool systems are inherently better than a Hit/Miss on D20. More dice rolls causes a regression tohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29257333/Dungeon_Command:_So,_so_close_to_buying,_but_wont?post_id=522596453#522596453Second place in a Realms, two DMF top 8s, invites to National Championship and Worlds, four Spectral Tigers won total.Yeah, I'm familiar with it. Dice pool systems are inherently better than a Hit/Miss on D20. More dice rolls causes a regression toSat, 04 Aug 2012 03:44:36 -0500