<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: The Bookish Barbarian: An Optimized Barbarian|Swordmage Striker</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29238031/The_Bookish_Barbarian:_An_Optimized_BarbarianSwordmage_Striker</link><description>The Bookish Barbarian: A Genasi Barbarian|Swordmage StrikerCore Variant:Genasi Barbarian|Swordmage/Avenger/Sword of Assault/Radiant OneCore Variant &#xD; &#xD; Show&#xD; &#xD; ====== Created Using Wizards of the Coast D&amp;D Character Builder ======level 30Genasi, Barb</description><item><title>Why's that? I mean, obviously having 2 leaders buffing/enabling you will be better than one, but what's missing from the hybrid such that splitting it does "way more"?I like defensive interrupts. Offensively, I typically have a couple (out of Strikeb</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29238031/The_Bookish_Barbarian:_An_Optimized_BarbarianSwordmage_Striker?post_id=532219781#532219781</link><description>Why's that? I mean, obviously having 2 leaders buffing/enabling you will be better than one, but what's missing from the hybrid such that splitting it does "way more"?I like defensive interrupts. Offensively, I typically have a couple (out of Strikeb</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:42:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Its actually completely different, because I can control my use of minors to adjust, as opposed to being at the mercy of IAs.And frankly, no, I want them to be separate. Pure Warlord and something /Luckbringer does way more for me and my group.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29238031/The_Bookish_Barbarian:_An_Optimized_BarbarianSwordmage_Striker?post_id=532219607#532219607</link><description>Its actually completely different, because I can control my use of minors to adjust, as opposed to being at the mercy of IAs.And frankly, no, I want them to be separate. Pure Warlord and something /Luckbringer does way more for me and my group.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:15:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So... you want a Cleric|Warlord/Luckbringer of Tymora? :)By the way, in terms of having an arsenal to handle any situation, it's obvious that this is beneficial. But there's typically an opportunity cost associated with it, in that by having lots of</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29238031/The_Bookish_Barbarian:_An_Optimized_BarbarianSwordmage_Striker?post_id=532219455#532219455</link><description>So... you want a Cleric|Warlord/Luckbringer of Tymora? :)By the way, in terms of having an arsenal to handle any situation, it's obvious that this is beneficial. But there's typically an opportunity cost associated with it, in that by having lots of</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 23:51:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Double post, but its worth noting that this build DESPERATELY wants two types of allies.1st, a Warlord, duh.2nd, and perhaps even more? A cleric, or really anyone with the Luckbringer of Tymora PP. Why? Because even at 20 that could be +50 to damage</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29238031/The_Bookish_Barbarian:_An_Optimized_BarbarianSwordmage_Striker?post_id=532219081#532219081</link><description>Double post, but its worth noting that this build DESPERATELY wants two types of allies.1st, a Warlord, duh.2nd, and perhaps even more? A cleric, or really anyone with the Luckbringer of Tymora PP. Why? Because even at 20 that could be +50 to damage</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:53:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah. Sure, if you're doing the cold op. There are other options though, to free up space and such.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29238031/The_Bookish_Barbarian:_An_Optimized_BarbarianSwordmage_Striker?post_id=532196449#532196449</link><description>Yeah. Sure, if you're doing the cold op. There are other options though, to free up space and such.</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:50:31 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
