<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Beholder vs. Dwarf</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29236201/Beholder_vs._Dwarf</link><description>I've been waiting for my players to get to a level where they could encounter a beholder.  The time has arrived!But I'm trying to wrap my head around how the beholder's powers will interact with our dwarf's Defender Aura.  The beholder can attack twi</description><item><title>I prefer to think of myself more as an anthropomorphic personification of schadenfreude.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29236201/Beholder_vs._Dwarf?post_id=522645527#522645527</link><description>I prefer to think of myself more as an anthropomorphic personification of schadenfreude.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:02:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Some men just want to watch the flamewar burn.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29236201/Beholder_vs._Dwarf?post_id=522631103#522631103</link><description>Some men just want to watch the flamewar burn.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:46:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>LOL! Nobody could replace you, LoW. ;) Actually, there's nothing constructive Alcestis (or anyone else) could really add to this debate at this point, because you've already covered the reasons why randomvirus is wrong quite thoroughly. But you've be</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29236201/Beholder_vs._Dwarf?post_id=522630849#522630849</link><description>LOL! Nobody could replace you, LoW. ;) Actually, there's nothing constructive Alcestis (or anyone else) could really add to this debate at this point, because you've already covered the reasons why randomvirus is wrong quite thoroughly. But you've be</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:18:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Have I really been gone so long that That Guy is the dude y'all anticipate as my replacement?(And now, there are two reasons to point him here.)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29236201/Beholder_vs._Dwarf?post_id=522629705#522629705</link><description>Have I really been gone so long that That Guy is the dude y'all anticipate as my replacement?(And now, there are two reasons to point him here.)</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 00:27:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Please explain where it says that Eye Rays is not an attack, and that Battle Guardian doesn't trigger on non-action attacks?Because RC 90 says Eye Rays is an attack, and HotFL 129 specifies the trigger of Battle Guardian as "makes an attack" without</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29236201/Beholder_vs._Dwarf?post_id=522626485#522626485</link><description>Please explain where it says that Eye Rays is not an attack, and that Battle Guardian doesn't trigger on non-action attacks?Because RC 90 says Eye Rays is an attack, and HotFL 129 specifies the trigger of Battle Guardian as "makes an attack" without</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 20:41:09 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
