<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dungeon Command Card/Rule Question</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29226159/Dungeon_Command_CardRule_Question</link><description>The Umber Hulk in the Dungeon Command game has the following action" (tap) As a standard action, choose one enemy within 5 squares and slide that enemy 3 squares, them make a melee attach that deals (sword) damage"Does this mean that the confused cre</description><item><title>It is not the confused target that attacks; it is the Umber Hulk.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29226159/Dungeon_Command_CardRule_Question?post_id=522684847#522684847</link><description>It is not the confused target that attacks; it is the Umber Hulk.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:15:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I assumed it meant the confused creature made the attack as well, but was unsure so I came here to see if there was a ruling on that.  And if it is the confused target that attacks, does it tap?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29226159/Dungeon_Command_CardRule_Question?post_id=522630769#522630769</link><description>I assumed it meant the confused creature made the attack as well, but was unsure so I came here to see if there was a ruling on that.  And if it is the confused target that attacks, does it tap?</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:11:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm a little confused by this ruling. To me it would make sense that using a confusion gaze would allow you to control the target and make it attack something. I also feel like that would be a much more interesting game mechanic. Just curious why the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29226159/Dungeon_Command_CardRule_Question?post_id=522453423#522453423</link><description>I'm a little confused by this ruling. To me it would make sense that using a confusion gaze would allow you to control the target and make it attack something. I also feel like that would be a much more interesting game mechanic. Just curious why the</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:47:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't worry about it! There are no typos on the Umber Hulk's card. Instead of making a normal Melee attack, the Umber Hulk can tap to slide any figure he can see within 5 squares of him up to 3 squares. He can then make a melee attack that deals his</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29226159/Dungeon_Command_CardRule_Question?post_id=522047731#522047731</link><description>Don't worry about it! There are no typos on the Umber Hulk's card. Instead of making a normal Melee attack, the Umber Hulk can tap to slide any figure he can see within 5 squares of him up to 3 squares. He can then make a melee attack that deals his</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:24:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I am also hit with the Umber Hulk Confusion Gaze.What confuses me is why the Umber Hulk can target a creature within 5 but can only slide it 3.Is that correct or a typo?And I'm sorry to ask yet another Umber Hulk question.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29226159/Dungeon_Command_CardRule_Question?post_id=522036187#522036187</link><description>I am also hit with the Umber Hulk Confusion Gaze.What confuses me is why the Umber Hulk can target a creature within 5 but can only slide it 3.Is that correct or a typo?And I'm sorry to ask yet another Umber Hulk question.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:20:31 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
