<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Ring of feather fall vs. lesser form</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29215059/Ring_of_feather_fall_vs._lesser_form</link><description>the ring of feather fall says take no damage and always land on feet. lesser just says take no damage. so if two characters fall one with each do both land on feet or just one with regular ring?</description><item><title>Probably because by the time it was published, they realized it was redundant.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29215059/Ring_of_feather_fall_vs._lesser_form?post_id=524457325#524457325</link><description>Probably because by the time it was published, they realized it was redundant.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:53:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>i brought this up due to the fact that of all items that prevent falling damage ,that i have seen, only the ring of lesser doesn't have the clause you always land on your feet.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29215059/Ring_of_feather_fall_vs._lesser_form?post_id=524457099#524457099</link><description>i brought this up due to the fact that of all items that prevent falling damage ,that i have seen, only the ring of lesser doesn't have the clause you always land on your feet.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:45:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You're more than welcome to ignore rules as you see fit.  It could well make the game more fun, particularly if the rules get in the way of your rile playing...But you're in the *Rules Q&amp;A forum*.  Here, when people ask what the rules are, we tell th</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29215059/Ring_of_feather_fall_vs._lesser_form?post_id=524427955#524427955</link><description>You're more than welcome to ignore rules as you see fit.  It could well make the game more fun, particularly if the rules get in the way of your rile playing...But you're in the *Rules Q&amp;A forum*.  Here, when people ask what the rules are, we tell th</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:51:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, no.  Significant disagreement.  DMs can, in fact, be wrong.  Nobody is right all the time, it's part of being human.  And I've been DMing as long as you have, so don't throw that 'new generation' crap around.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29215059/Ring_of_feather_fall_vs._lesser_form?post_id=524420753#524420753</link><description>Yeah, no.  Significant disagreement.  DMs can, in fact, be wrong.  Nobody is right all the time, it's part of being human.  And I've been DMing as long as you have, so don't throw that 'new generation' crap around.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:23:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Therein lies the problem with most of the new generation gamers, especially those playing D&amp;D for the 1st time (4e).To be honest, I've never seen such rules lawyering over the last 2 editions, most especially 4e (these forums as a prime example), and</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29215059/Ring_of_feather_fall_vs._lesser_form?post_id=524420551#524420551</link><description>Therein lies the problem with most of the new generation gamers, especially those playing D&amp;D for the 1st time (4e).To be honest, I've never seen such rules lawyering over the last 2 editions, most especially 4e (these forums as a prime example), and</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:12:40 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
