New Posts For Thread: Rule of Three - June 19thhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29186893/Rule_of_Three_-_June_19thRule of Three: 6/19/12 by Rodney Thompson You've got questions—we've got answers! Here's how it works—each week, our Community Manager will be scouring all available sources to find whatever questions you're asking. Talk about this artI like the Sun Cleric archetype (wizard healer, white mage). So Id be the first to cry if it sucks, but it seems ok to me, so far.First, the Sun Cleric at level one gets access to range-attack domain spells. So it is a nonmelee archetype.Second, regahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29186893/Rule_of_Three_-_June_19th?post_id=521024569#521024569I like the Sun Cleric archetype (wizard healer, white mage). So Id be the first to cry if it sucks, but it seems ok to me, so far.First, the Sun Cleric at level one gets access to range-attack domain spells. So it is a nonmelee archetype.Second, regaTue, 19 Jun 2012 22:38:07 -0500@AllI'm in the camp that believes all editions have something to contribute and all have things I'd rather avoid. @StolocIf you mean worse off than it could be then I agree. If you mean worse off than 4e itself I would not agree. I'd play any edithttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29186893/Rule_of_Three_-_June_19th?post_id=521024389#521024389@AllI'm in the camp that believes all editions have something to contribute and all have things I'd rather avoid. @StolocIf you mean worse off than it could be then I agree. If you mean worse off than 4e itself I would not agree. I'd play any editTue, 19 Jun 2012 22:26:32 -0500The question is whether that's widely acceptable throughout D&D games, as opposed to a houserule.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29186893/Rule_of_Three_-_June_19th?post_id=521024249#521024249The question is whether that's widely acceptable throughout D&D games, as opposed to a houserule.Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:18:27 -0500Wow, that's a simplistic view. Personally, I am in the party (currently) of going back to 1e/2e model (which is distinctive from the 3e model) with improvements from 3e and 4e added to the system. Believe it or not, there are individuals out therehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29186893/Rule_of_Three_-_June_19th?post_id=521024245#521024245Wow, that's a simplistic view. Personally, I am in the party (currently) of going back to 1e/2e model (which is distinctive from the 3e model) with improvements from 3e and 4e added to the system. Believe it or not, there are individuals out thereTue, 19 Jun 2012 22:18:20 -0500Actually everyone who likes 4e who posts on these forums seems to say they realize 4e has flaws and they would like to see those flaws fixed and the foundation of 4e to be improved. To me it appears that others want the game to go back to 1/2/3e an thttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29186893/Rule_of_Three_-_June_19th?post_id=521024099#521024099Actually everyone who likes 4e who posts on these forums seems to say they realize 4e has flaws and they would like to see those flaws fixed and the foundation of 4e to be improved. To me it appears that others want the game to go back to 1/2/3e an tTue, 19 Jun 2012 22:09:43 -0500