<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Reintroducing what made me stop playing D&amp;D</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29146811/Reintroducing_what_made_me_stop_playing_DD</link><description>3e and 4e, as imperfect as they are, at least have clear design goals. The only design goal of Next seems to be to make it like the older editions. This is the only explanation for a number of baffling design decisions. The result is that the design</description><item><title>In that case you would need a COMPANY like Pathfinder.  I doubt there is a company out there that can seriously take this on and grant monthly support.  Certainly nothing like DDI, but I doubt even Pelgrane could match the output of Paizo.Look at Gre</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29146811/Reintroducing_what_made_me_stop_playing_DD?post_id=520296145#520296145</link><description>In that case you would need a COMPANY like Pathfinder.  I doubt there is a company out there that can seriously take this on and grant monthly support.  Certainly nothing like DDI, but I doubt even Pelgrane could match the output of Paizo.Look at Gre</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:05:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, true, but unless you get a major publisher like Paizo to publish it, there's not likely to be much support for it. And you can already produce new 4e material today under the licensing scheme. So, what he is suggesting is having some publisher</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29146811/Reintroducing_what_made_me_stop_playing_DD?post_id=520294689#520294689</link><description>Yeah, true, but unless you get a major publisher like Paizo to publish it, there's not likely to be much support for it. And you can already produce new 4e material today under the licensing scheme. So, what he is suggesting is having some publisher</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:31:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm assuming he wants continued support in the way of modules and supplements the way Pathfinder is doing now.I was suggesting for him and not me.  I'm no fan of 4e.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29146811/Reintroducing_what_made_me_stop_playing_DD?post_id=520294437#520294437</link><description>I'm assuming he wants continued support in the way of modules and supplements the way Pathfinder is doing now.I was suggesting for him and not me.  I'm no fan of 4e.</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:25:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Why do you need a 4e clone anyway? Why not just play 4e as long as you want?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29146811/Reintroducing_what_made_me_stop_playing_DD?post_id=520294385#520294385</link><description>Why do you need a 4e clone anyway? Why not just play 4e as long as you want?</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:23:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>They can do a 4e clone and I don't doubt there will be one.   13th Age is different but it seems to target the same audience.   But there will be others.  The OGL makes it nearly impossible for them to prevent even a 4e clone.  Yes the power names ar</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29146811/Reintroducing_what_made_me_stop_playing_DD?post_id=520294309#520294309</link><description>They can do a 4e clone and I don't doubt there will be one.   13th Age is different but it seems to target the same audience.   But there will be others.  The OGL makes it nearly impossible for them to prevent even a 4e clone.  Yes the power names ar</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:21:59 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
