<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dexterity is too good</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139443/Dexterity_is_too_good</link><description>I'm starting to feel as though Dex offers more than many of the other abilities.  I first starting thinking this when I looked at the armor chart.  Light armor is quite obviously better than heavy armor; the problem only gets worse as levels increase</description><item><title>I tend to agree with most people here, that there was an over compensation for finesse characters, though I applaud the intent, as speed and agility are very important components in combat, just ask Bruce Lee or as the kids say these days, Chuck Norr</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139443/Dexterity_is_too_good?post_id=520155217#520155217</link><description>I tend to agree with most people here, that there was an over compensation for finesse characters, though I applaud the intent, as speed and agility are very important components in combat, just ask Bruce Lee or as the kids say these days, Chuck Norr</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 01:02:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Good point.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139443/Dexterity_is_too_good?post_id=520154605#520154605</link><description>Good point.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:02:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Why don't they just raise the AC bonus of heavy armor by 2 points? That would make heavy armors equal to DEX-maxed light armor, which it really should be. Honesly, it should be HIGHER than light armor, since the whole point of heavy armor should be t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139443/Dexterity_is_too_good?post_id=520154427#520154427</link><description>Why don't they just raise the AC bonus of heavy armor by 2 points? That would make heavy armors equal to DEX-maxed light armor, which it really should be. Honesly, it should be HIGHER than light armor, since the whole point of heavy armor should be t</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 23:48:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I like the wis for initiative idea enough that I will start a petition in a new thread where you can vote yay or nay for it.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139443/Dexterity_is_too_good?post_id=520128695#520128695</link><description>I like the wis for initiative idea enough that I will start a petition in a new thread where you can vote yay or nay for it.</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:14:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hmmm... atm, I tend to agree.  But, we'll see if using big two-handed weapon or new rules for the Power Attack feat change how capable a strength speced Fighter is. Polaris, Mellack, and others: what would you guys do to improve the utility of streng</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139443/Dexterity_is_too_good?post_id=520128021#520128021</link><description>Hmmm... atm, I tend to agree.  But, we'll see if using big two-handed weapon or new rules for the Power Attack feat change how capable a strength speced Fighter is. Polaris, Mellack, and others: what would you guys do to improve the utility of streng</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 08:51:41 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
