<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Thumbs up and thumbs down</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139141/Thumbs_up_and_thumbs_down</link><description>Like:&amp;bull; Surprise = -20 initiative&amp;bull; Switching weapons, retrieving potions etc = free actions&amp;bull; Advantage/disadvantage&amp;bull; Ethereal combines insubstantial &amp; phasing&amp;bull; The idea of ringmail&amp;bull; Masterwork weapons&amp;bull; You can&amp;rsquo;</description><item><title>Prior to 4E I described things in meters, fudging that 5 feet was close enough to 1meter as far as I cared.  That worked really well for my group, and when 4E introduced squares it wasn't even a change for us.@Lharn I would assume charging and slow w</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139141/Thumbs_up_and_thumbs_down?post_id=520080151#520080151</link><description>Prior to 4E I described things in meters, fudging that 5 feet was close enough to 1meter as far as I cared.  That worked really well for my group, and when 4E introduced squares it wasn't even a change for us.@Lharn I would assume charging and slow w</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:38:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1 square = 5' = 1", it doesent really matter. This mechanich goes back to the tactacal game roots of D&amp;D. Like WAY back. As for using the hex, why not. Well look at flanking, how would it be drawn? Grids made layout easier since we used graph paper b</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139141/Thumbs_up_and_thumbs_down?post_id=520079565#520079565</link><description>1 square = 5' = 1", it doesent really matter. This mechanich goes back to the tactacal game roots of D&amp;D. Like WAY back. As for using the hex, why not. Well look at flanking, how would it be drawn? Grids made layout easier since we used graph paper b</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:59:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>As for ft. vs squares, I don't get why they don't just do both. It's pretty easy to list people's speed as 30 ft. (6 squares). Then everyone is happy.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139141/Thumbs_up_and_thumbs_down?post_id=520079453#520079453</link><description>As for ft. vs squares, I don't get why they don't just do both. It's pretty easy to list people's speed as 30 ft. (6 squares). Then everyone is happy.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:51:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Great point, hadn't thought of that. Now I can use the back side of my Chessex battle mat! I've officially changed my stance. I now prefer the expressions in feet. Thanks!</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139141/Thumbs_up_and_thumbs_down?post_id=520079351#520079351</link><description>Great point, hadn't thought of that. Now I can use the back side of my Chessex battle mat! I've officially changed my stance. I now prefer the expressions in feet. Thanks!</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:44:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>On the topic of feet vs squares, I can understand why some people would prefer squares, but I always felt hexes were better, so I'm glad I can take feet and use them to make hexes, and people who actually like squares can just use feet to make square</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29139141/Thumbs_up_and_thumbs_down?post_id=520078457#520078457</link><description>On the topic of feet vs squares, I can understand why some people would prefer squares, but I always felt hexes were better, so I'm glad I can take feet and use them to make hexes, and people who actually like squares can just use feet to make square</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:50:19 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
