New Posts For Thread: First Readhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29138721/First_ReadOn a first read though I am pleasantly surprised. The advantage/disadvantage system looks good, and could be very flexible and used in many situations. Much easier than trying to find a +- to apply.The to-hit and damage bonuses on the character sheeI agree! A pleasant surprise! I need to play more but am enjoying the old skool/new paint feel.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29138721/First_Read?post_id=520080971#520080971I agree! A pleasant surprise! I need to play more but am enjoying the old skool/new paint feel.Sat, 26 May 2012 01:28:37 -0500My First Read feedback is at an even lower level. I believe Nitpicking is the termThe Adv/Disadv mechanic is cute - avoids a lot of fuss.I don't like the d20 resolution - too random.Biggest Dislike: "fire" a bow? You don't Fire a bow, you loose an arhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29138721/First_Read?post_id=520080911#520080911My First Read feedback is at an even lower level. I believe Nitpicking is the termThe Adv/Disadv mechanic is cute - avoids a lot of fuss.I don't like the d20 resolution - too random.Biggest Dislike: "fire" a bow? You don't Fire a bow, you loose an arSat, 26 May 2012 01:24:46 -0500On a first read though I am pleasantly surprised. The advantage/disadvantage system looks good, and could be very flexible and used in many situations. Much easier than trying to find a +- to apply.The to-hit and damage bonuses on the character sheehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29138721/First_Read?post_id=520070685#520070685On a first read though I am pleasantly surprised. The advantage/disadvantage system looks good, and could be very flexible and used in many situations. Much easier than trying to find a +- to apply.The to-hit and damage bonuses on the character sheeFri, 25 May 2012 16:53:38 -0500