<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Up Close and Personal - A Garrote Rogue Handbook</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28968605/Up_Close_and_Personal_-_A_Garrote_Rogue_Handbook</link><description>Up Close and PersonalA Guide for Garrote RoguesAdmit it, you just want to look this good...So, here you are.  You want to kill, but you want to do it with a little flair, a little style.  You want to look good while you do it.  Any old rogue can grab</description><item><title>Fighters (brawler) and assassins (garrot strangle) are the big choices.I think monks have some grab support as well.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28968605/Up_Close_and_Personal_-_A_Garrote_Rogue_Handbook?post_id=517613013#517613013</link><description>Fighters (brawler) and assassins (garrot strangle) are the big choices.I think monks have some grab support as well.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:08:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>hey ya'llsorry I've been so slow on this book, as, you know, life...anyways, I should get a fair bit done this weekend.Something I would like help with from all of you smart people out there, is the Hybrid section.  It is honestly, nothing I had ever</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28968605/Up_Close_and_Personal_-_A_Garrote_Rogue_Handbook?post_id=517593985#517593985</link><description>hey ya'llsorry I've been so slow on this book, as, you know, life...anyways, I should get a fair bit done this weekend.Something I would like help with from all of you smart people out there, is the Hybrid section.  It is honestly, nothing I had ever</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:52:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There's two ways to read the sentence:ORWhich is actually meant is up for grabs, but I don't see much point for a DM to go for the more restrictive ruling except to be a jerk. It's not like this style is going to be powerful even with sneak attack ap</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28968605/Up_Close_and_Personal_-_A_Garrote_Rogue_Handbook?post_id=517464693#517464693</link><description>There's two ways to read the sentence:ORWhich is actually meant is up for grabs, but I don't see much point for a DM to go for the more restrictive ruling except to be a jerk. It's not like this style is going to be powerful even with sneak attack ap</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:28:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That was my next thought indeed ^^</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28968605/Up_Close_and_Personal_-_A_Garrote_Rogue_Handbook?post_id=517440993#517440993</link><description>That was my next thought indeed ^^</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:24:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No PMC cheese either, since Garrote Training eats your multi-class.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28968605/Up_Close_and_Personal_-_A_Garrote_Rogue_Handbook?post_id=517440775#517440775</link><description>No PMC cheese either, since Garrote Training eats your multi-class.</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:17:06 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
