<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What defender would you play?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28949261/What_defender_would_you_play</link><description>I can't decide in this group composition what defender to choose. Shaman Cosmic SorcererBlackguard Cleric Zealot Ranged Ranger</description><item><title>Thanks everybody</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28949261/What_defender_would_you_play?post_id=517068739#517068739</link><description>Thanks everybody</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:56:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I played a battlemind as the only defender in a 6 pc party from 1-4 lvl.  He was awesome with one exception.  Daze was the absolute worst.  The battlemind relies on reactions and daze completely robs you of you ability to do anything.  Immobilize nev</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28949261/What_defender_would_you_play?post_id=517061697#517061697</link><description>I played a battlemind as the only defender in a 6 pc party from 1-4 lvl.  He was awesome with one exception.  Daze was the absolute worst.  The battlemind relies on reactions and daze completely robs you of you ability to do anything.  Immobilize nev</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:25:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>INT primary just means rounding out your party with INT skills...Arcana, Religion, etc.  They're useful, but hardly necessary.  My group plays without an INT primary character.  Every now and then we wish we had someone better at the skill, but we ge</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28949261/What_defender_would_you_play?post_id=517048565#517048565</link><description>INT primary just means rounding out your party with INT skills...Arcana, Religion, etc.  They're useful, but hardly necessary.  My group plays without an INT primary character.  Every now and then we wish we had someone better at the skill, but we ge</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:38:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe I'm really underestimating the importantce of a INT primary, I was going to go Dragonborn/Kulkor Arms Master and try to abuse the pushing and proning etc.... You made me rethink the INT primary situation but I'll still linger on it. Is shieldin</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28949261/What_defender_would_you_play?post_id=517027833#517027833</link><description>Maybe I'm really underestimating the importantce of a INT primary, I was going to go Dragonborn/Kulkor Arms Master and try to abuse the pushing and proning etc.... You made me rethink the INT primary situation but I'll still linger on it. Is shieldin</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:45:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>There is no one in your group that has the INT primary and I feel that is important. Swordmage is a strong choice. I would also consider Battlemind due to no CON primary either but it is less needed in a group. The need for marking many opponents is</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28949261/What_defender_would_you_play?post_id=517020769#517020769</link><description>There is no one in your group that has the INT primary and I feel that is important. Swordmage is a strong choice. I would also consider Battlemind due to no CON primary either but it is less needed in a group. The need for marking many opponents is</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:53:05 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
