<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: How digital should 5E be?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28904367/How_digital_should_5E_be</link><description>Reading though the forums, I've noticed sharp differences of opinion about how digital D&amp;D should be.One side is in favor of leveraging smartphones, computers, and online tools to their fullest extent.  It would keep costs down and make difficult tas</description><item><title>You know this is a very valid question.  I would personally like to see Wizards take a more measured approach to this topic.  My group personally uses both digital and hard copies of the books.  We own 90-95% of 3.0/3.5 content and it is always there</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28904367/How_digital_should_5E_be?post_id=516411451#516411451</link><description>You know this is a very valid question.  I would personally like to see Wizards take a more measured approach to this topic.  My group personally uses both digital and hard copies of the books.  We own 90-95% of 3.0/3.5 content and it is always there</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:14:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Phoenix, again we are on the same wavelength my brother.  I moved my rant about the online options I would like to the D&amp;D next group comments.  Essentially, I want access and help to make my work as a DM easier, but I'm not interested in a video gam</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28904367/How_digital_should_5E_be?post_id=516379061#516379061</link><description>Phoenix, again we are on the same wavelength my brother.  I moved my rant about the online options I would like to the D&amp;D next group comments.  Essentially, I want access and help to make my work as a DM easier, but I'm not interested in a video gam</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:32:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The big fail on this is the assumption that people who want only the electronic format are on a restrictive budget. In monetary terms.I'm on a space and weight budget. I could buy a hardbound game book - or two, possibly three - every month, without</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28904367/How_digital_should_5E_be?post_id=516378189#516378189</link><description>The big fail on this is the assumption that people who want only the electronic format are on a restrictive budget. In monetary terms.I'm on a space and weight budget. I could buy a hardbound game book - or two, possibly three - every month, without</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:13:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>my preference would be three layers, layer one would be pdfs/printed books hybrids, the pdfs would be subject to upgrades and corrections, while the printed version would cost a little more but include bells and whistles like maps, battle mats, art w</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28904367/How_digital_should_5E_be?post_id=516317561#516317561</link><description>my preference would be three layers, layer one would be pdfs/printed books hybrids, the pdfs would be subject to upgrades and corrections, while the printed version would cost a little more but include bells and whistles like maps, battle mats, art w</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:10:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think the offer or availability of digital is essential, but it should in NO WAY reduce or replace dice, books, paper, etc. It's two different paradigms that should be mixed on an individual, not a manufacturing level.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28904367/How_digital_should_5E_be?post_id=516282659#516282659</link><description>I think the offer or availability of digital is essential, but it should in NO WAY reduce or replace dice, books, paper, etc. It's two different paradigms that should be mixed on an individual, not a manufacturing level.</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:20:27 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
