<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Math question.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28475439/Math_question.</link><description>Does 0.999(repeating1) = 1?Why?_________________1 - I can't figure out how to do the little bar. If you know how, let me know.</description><item><title>Meh, boring troll is boring. You've done better. Staying in character is good, but you blocked with pure lunacy too soon. We could have gone at least another page or two before you had to resort to stupid-crazy in order to bulwark your "point."[/quot</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28475439/Math_question.?post_id=509751613#509751613</link><description>Meh, boring troll is boring. You've done better. Staying in character is good, but you blocked with pure lunacy too soon. We could have gone at least another page or two before you had to resort to stupid-crazy in order to bulwark your "point."[/quot</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:16:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Meh, boring troll is boring. You've done better. Staying in character is good, but you blocked with pure lunacy too soon. We could have gone at least another page or two before you had to resort to stupid-crazy in order to bulwark your "point."[/quot</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28475439/Math_question.?post_id=509747349#509747349</link><description>Meh, boring troll is boring. You've done better. Staying in character is good, but you blocked with pure lunacy too soon. We could have gone at least another page or two before you had to resort to stupid-crazy in order to bulwark your "point."[/quot</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:45:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Meh, boring troll is boring. You've done better. Staying in character is good, but you blocked with pure lunacy too soon. We could have gone at least another page or two before you had to resort to stupid-crazy in order to bulwark your "point."</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28475439/Math_question.?post_id=509746671#509746671</link><description>Meh, boring troll is boring. You've done better. Staying in character is good, but you blocked with pure lunacy too soon. We could have gone at least another page or two before you had to resort to stupid-crazy in order to bulwark your "point."</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:31:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not peer reviewed. Not good enough. :-P[/quote]Peer review doesn't determine truth value.Wikipedia contains a number of proofs. - dependant on your intelligence, pick one you understand.(see the fallacy I used?)[/quote]You fail at getting jokes. Lose</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28475439/Math_question.?post_id=509745085#509745085</link><description>Not peer reviewed. Not good enough. :-P[/quote]Peer review doesn't determine truth value.Wikipedia contains a number of proofs. - dependant on your intelligence, pick one you understand.(see the fallacy I used?)[/quote]You fail at getting jokes. Lose</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:02:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not peer reviewed. Not good enough. :-P[/quote]Peer review doesn't determine truth value. Wikipedia contains a number of proofs. - dependant on your intelligence, pick one you understand.(see the fallacy I used?)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28475439/Math_question.?post_id=509744793#509744793</link><description>Not peer reviewed. Not good enough. :-P[/quote]Peer review doesn't determine truth value. Wikipedia contains a number of proofs. - dependant on your intelligence, pick one you understand.(see the fallacy I used?)</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:55:59 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
