<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: This appears to work, but it caused a lot of confusion...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28317663/This_appears_to_work,_but_it_caused_a_lot_of_confusion...</link><description>At our LFR table yesterday, a player presented us with this bizarre conundrum.He's playing a Drow, and he took both the Instinctive Darkness and Shadowslip Feats.  This resulted in the following exchange:1) his character is targeted by a Melee 4 atta</description><item><title>Let's do keep it friendly folks.  It's ok to debate ideas and even strongly disagree, just don't attack the other *people* posting on our forums. Thanks!ORC_Chaos</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28317663/This_appears_to_work,_but_it_caused_a_lot_of_confusion...?post_id=512010379#512010379</link><description>Let's do keep it friendly folks.  It's ok to debate ideas and even strongly disagree, just don't attack the other *people* posting on our forums. Thanks!ORC_Chaos</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:36:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Alright I stand corrected then!</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28317663/This_appears_to_work,_but_it_caused_a_lot_of_confusion...?post_id=512010315#512010315</link><description>Alright I stand corrected then!</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:34:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Customer Service is not a reliable, official, or authoritative source for rules.[/quote]It's more reliable then our opinion. And I can guarantee that if they agree with you, you would cite them as evidence.[/quote]I have, in fact, done the exact oppo</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28317663/This_appears_to_work,_but_it_caused_a_lot_of_confusion...?post_id=512010251#512010251</link><description>Customer Service is not a reliable, official, or authoritative source for rules.[/quote]It's more reliable then our opinion. And I can guarantee that if they agree with you, you would cite them as evidence.[/quote]I have, in fact, done the exact oppo</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:32:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Customer Service is not a reliable, official, or authoritative source for rules.[/quote]It's more reliable then our opinion. And I can guarantee that if they agree with you, you would cite them as evidence.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28317663/This_appears_to_work,_but_it_caused_a_lot_of_confusion...?post_id=512010143#512010143</link><description>Customer Service is not a reliable, official, or authoritative source for rules.[/quote]It's more reliable then our opinion. And I can guarantee that if they agree with you, you would cite them as evidence.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:29:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You have not demonstrated anything. You assert that majority opinion violates several rules but cannot quote a single one that is relevant to the discussion. Ready an action is irrelevant. The only thing relevant is making an attack process and timin</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28317663/This_appears_to_work,_but_it_caused_a_lot_of_confusion...?post_id=512010117#512010117</link><description>You have not demonstrated anything. You assert that majority opinion violates several rules but cannot quote a single one that is relevant to the discussion. Ready an action is irrelevant. The only thing relevant is making an attack process and timin</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:27:56 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
