New Posts For Thread: 4th Edition Reviews.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28292891/4th_Edition_Reviews.Okay so do any of you remember when 4th just came out? All the haters, and people saying its just like WoW? Well guys it been approximately 4 years! Has anyones opinion changed? I think WotC has done a terrific job. With all the new books options andThe crunchy bits from FR, Eberron, and Dark Sun are good. Very good. I'm not sure how they could compile them all into a single book and have an actual "theme" to the book, though, without them being campaign setting books. The only exception I can rhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28292891/4th_Edition_Reviews.?post_id=507464617#507464617The crunchy bits from FR, Eberron, and Dark Sun are good. Very good. I'm not sure how they could compile them all into a single book and have an actual "theme" to the book, though, without them being campaign setting books. The only exception I can rSun, 02 Oct 2011 11:34:24 -0500The crunchy bits from FR, Eberron, and Dark Sun are good. Very good. I'm not sure how they could compile them all into a single book and have an actual "theme" to the book, though, without them being campaign setting books. The only exception I can rhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28292891/4th_Edition_Reviews.?post_id=507458367#507458367The crunchy bits from FR, Eberron, and Dark Sun are good. Very good. I'm not sure how they could compile them all into a single book and have an actual "theme" to the book, though, without them being campaign setting books. The only exception I can rSun, 02 Oct 2011 09:14:01 -0500MM3 and PHB2 were good in 3.5 as well. The powers system is kinda good but seems inherently limited before it becomes staile so any new class has to compete with 3 years of well supported PHB classes.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28292891/4th_Edition_Reviews.?post_id=507445903#507445903MM3 and PHB2 were good in 3.5 as well. The powers system is kinda good but seems inherently limited before it becomes staile so any new class has to compete with 3 years of well supported PHB classes.Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:06:36 -0500I agree with this wholeheartedly. The core set was quite buggy. By the time MM3 came along, I had almost wrote 4E off as yet another WotC idea that started strong but was slowly swirling down the drain. PHB3 was, arguably, the most useless PHB to dathttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28292891/4th_Edition_Reviews.?post_id=507443759#507443759I agree with this wholeheartedly. The core set was quite buggy. By the time MM3 came along, I had almost wrote 4E off as yet another WotC idea that started strong but was slowly swirling down the drain. PHB3 was, arguably, the most useless PHB to datSat, 01 Oct 2011 19:47:31 -0500I agree with this wholeheartedly. The core set was quite buggy. By the time MM3 came along, I had almost wrote 4E off as yet another WotC idea that started strong but was slowly swirling down the drain. PHB3 was, arguably, the most useless PHB to dathttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28292891/4th_Edition_Reviews.?post_id=507443113#507443113I agree with this wholeheartedly. The core set was quite buggy. By the time MM3 came along, I had almost wrote 4E off as yet another WotC idea that started strong but was slowly swirling down the drain. PHB3 was, arguably, the most useless PHB to datSat, 01 Oct 2011 19:16:17 -0500