<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Very Distracting warlock (-14 to hit and dazed)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28276273/Very_Distracting_warlock_(-14_to_hit_and_dazed)</link><description>Built to impose as much attack penalty as possible.  Mostly focued around Dizzying Mace + dazing, which gives -10 to hit.Tack on Psychic lock for -2 morerattling -2 (encounter powers only).= -12 (14 with encounter powers) to hit (and dazed).And a con</description><item><title>So 75%? (55 base+5 accurate+10CA+5headband).Roll twice = 1-(.25*.25)= 93.75%Guess it about the same as mine.but yea, it comes down to single target with a better penalty vs multi will less penalty.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28276273/Very_Distracting_warlock_(-14_to_hit_and_dazed)?post_id=506779545#506779545</link><description>So 75%? (55 base+5 accurate+10CA+5headband).Roll twice = 1-(.25*.25)= 93.75%Guess it about the same as mine.but yea, it comes down to single target with a better penalty vs multi will less penalty.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:27:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Probably better than 65% with Headband of Intellect/Accurate Implement plus the fact we have combat advantage a lot of the time (on redazing already dazed targets).  But your build does apply more penalties, so it's better on a single target.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28276273/Very_Distracting_warlock_(-14_to_hit_and_dazed)?post_id=506755231#506755231</link><description>Probably better than 65% with Headband of Intellect/Accurate Implement plus the fact we have combat advantage a lot of the time (on redazing already dazed targets).  But your build does apply more penalties, so it's better on a single target.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:35:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What's the to-hit for headspin?  65%?1-(.45*.45) = 0.7975, or hit on a 4.vs hit on a 2.  (plus an encounter reroll)You need a reroll @ 80% to beat it.Which is possible if you do the revenant/deva cheese.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28276273/Very_Distracting_warlock_(-14_to_hit_and_dazed)?post_id=506748609#506748609</link><description>What's the to-hit for headspin?  65%?1-(.45*.45) = 0.7975, or hit on a 4.vs hit on a 2.  (plus an encounter reroll)You need a reroll @ 80% to beat it.Which is possible if you do the revenant/deva cheese.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:01:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Has anyone done this with a cleric/warlock mc fighter con/wis build?  With hybrid BCL you would not need to worry about armor.I do like that you used nightmare weaver.  That is one of my favorite warlock paragon paths and was planning to use it with</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28276273/Very_Distracting_warlock_(-14_to_hit_and_dazed)?post_id=506748177#506748177</link><description>Has anyone done this with a cleric/warlock mc fighter con/wis build?  With hybrid BCL you would not need to worry about armor.I do like that you used nightmare weaver.  That is one of my favorite warlock paragon paths and was planning to use it with</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:53:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>True on all points except the accuracy (Headspin rolls twice via Divine Oracle, so it wins out on accuracy imo).  It's still an interesting build, and I have my eye on the Starlock article to see if any aoe dazing possibilities emerge there.In partic</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/28276273/Very_Distracting_warlock_(-14_to_hit_and_dazed)?post_id=506747975#506747975</link><description>True on all points except the accuracy (Headspin rolls twice via Divine Oracle, so it wins out on accuracy imo).  It's still an interesting build, and I have my eye on the Starlock article to see if any aoe dazing possibilities emerge there.In partic</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:48:27 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
