<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Implement Proficiency</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/27644045/Implement_Proficiency</link><description>Does a character need to be proficient with an implement (holy symbol, tome, orb, wand etc) to gain benefits of:Properties?At-Will powers?Encounter powers?Daily powers?I know that unlike weapons, implements don't grant enchantment bonus when you're n</description><item><title>Yes.  If you have implement proficiency, but no implement powers, you can use the powers and properties of implements, but not use the enhancement bonus to any effect, because you don't have any powers with the implement keyword.  If you were to gain</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/27644045/Implement_Proficiency?post_id=525907683#525907683</link><description>Yes.  If you have implement proficiency, but no implement powers, you can use the powers and properties of implements, but not use the enhancement bonus to any effect, because you don't have any powers with the implement keyword.  If you were to gain</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 02:54:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>What would be the case without having the implement keyword with your attacks or at-wills but still having the Holy Symbol profeciency? Such as with a blackgaurd? Would it mean you can still use the associated property or power but can not use the en</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/27644045/Implement_Proficiency?post_id=525905753#525905753</link><description>What would be the case without having the implement keyword with your attacks or at-wills but still having the Holy Symbol profeciency? Such as with a blackgaurd? Would it mean you can still use the associated property or power but can not use the en</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:22:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>PHB didn't specify item powers in any way, and left ambiguous is not a good thing.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/27644045/Implement_Proficiency?post_id=496175413#496175413</link><description>PHB didn't specify item powers in any way, and left ambiguous is not a good thing.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 16:03:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>While the PHB doesn't list this as a general rule for implements, every entry on magic implements in Chapter 7 spells this out, too; for instance, under Holy Symbols on p. 236: "If you are a member of a class that can use a holy symbol as an implemen</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/27644045/Implement_Proficiency?post_id=496169645#496169645</link><description>While the PHB doesn't list this as a general rule for implements, every entry on magic implements in Chapter 7 spells this out, too; for instance, under Holy Symbols on p. 236: "If you are a member of a class that can use a holy symbol as an implemen</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:11:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Guess I need to invest in Rules Compendium... PHB doesn't cut it anymore.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/27644045/Implement_Proficiency?post_id=496167041#496167041</link><description>Guess I need to invest in Rules Compendium... PHB doesn't cut it anymore.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:47:44 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
