<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Mounts and pyrokinetic characters</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26626057/Mounts_and_pyrokinetic_characters</link><description>Hi there,I have a player who has a pyrokinetic doppelganger. What happens if he's riding a mount with his fiery aura? Is the mount getting burned every time it "ends its turn adjacent to the character", or is the mount immune to it? Does the aura ema</description><item><title>Maybe with an asbestos saddle...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26626057/Mounts_and_pyrokinetic_characters?post_id=483167105#483167105</link><description>Maybe with an asbestos saddle...</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:44:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>My basic rule of thumb has always been this: If something is going to take away from having fun then just work around the problem with the quickest/easiest solution to keep the game moving.  For the pyrokinetic in the game I was running, I simply sai</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26626057/Mounts_and_pyrokinetic_characters?post_id=482438405#482438405</link><description>My basic rule of thumb has always been this: If something is going to take away from having fun then just work around the problem with the quickest/easiest solution to keep the game moving.  For the pyrokinetic in the game I was running, I simply sai</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:32:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>yeah, my confusing mainly stemmed from lack of Monster knowledge, it seemed like they were shortcuting GW, til i had time to look at the monster entries and compare. it just seemes unusual for it to act like that, but like i said it would only really</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26626057/Mounts_and_pyrokinetic_characters?post_id=482394457#482394457</link><description>yeah, my confusing mainly stemmed from lack of Monster knowledge, it seemed like they were shortcuting GW, til i had time to look at the monster entries and compare. it just seemes unusual for it to act like that, but like i said it would only really</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:28:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't worry, it's an easy mistake to make.#1 Rule of Rules Interpretation: ignore titles and fluff text.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26626057/Mounts_and_pyrokinetic_characters?post_id=482338585#482338585</link><description>Don't worry, it's an easy mistake to make.#1 Rule of Rules Interpretation: ignore titles and fluff text.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:40:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>it functions exactly like an aura, and is worded exactly as if it were. The only difference is that it doesn't say "aura 1" out next to it, and while i know Wotc is infallible, i could see them assuming we would be able to put 2 and 2 together. RAW y</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26626057/Mounts_and_pyrokinetic_characters?post_id=482324313#482324313</link><description>it functions exactly like an aura, and is worded exactly as if it were. The only difference is that it doesn't say "aura 1" out next to it, and while i know Wotc is infallible, i could see them assuming we would be able to put 2 and 2 together. RAW y</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:49:43 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
