<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Genasi Scorcherer: PEACH</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24951693/Genasi_Scorcherer:_PEACH</link><description>So I started out building a fire based Gensi sorc (hence the name) and eventually ended up changing it to... something that didn't really work. SO I changed it AGAIN to... and AGAIN!Initial stated average DPR assumes going to be attacked after I end</description><item><title>Yeah, you don't see many of those these days... I've never really looked for ways to do it. Well, I did once but then they nerfed most of the save-ends stuff... oh well! lolSorry to hear about your toe! I've never had a broken bone, but my finger got</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24951693/Genasi_Scorcherer:_PEACH?post_id=452506125#452506125</link><description>Yeah, you don't see many of those these days... I've never really looked for ways to do it. Well, I did once but then they nerfed most of the save-ends stuff... oh well! lolSorry to hear about your toe! I've never had a broken bone, but my finger got</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:43:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'll get to the Wracker over the next few days.  And then I'll probably have go look at the Slasher builds.  (My toe is broken so I have lots of spare time).  I'd been avoiding the Slashers because they all popped up right after my Winter Stunlock bu</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24951693/Genasi_Scorcherer:_PEACH?post_id=452501897#452501897</link><description>I'll get to the Wracker over the next few days.  And then I'll probably have go look at the Slasher builds.  (My toe is broken so I have lots of spare time).  I'd been avoiding the Slashers because they all popped up right after my Winter Stunlock bu</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:15:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Dude, I made so many changes to that build I'm not surprised there are discrepancies...I would show you my math, if I could remember it or I kept copies, but I just do it all over again each time and generally in different, convoluted and somewhat in</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24951693/Genasi_Scorcherer:_PEACH?post_id=452499861#452499861</link><description>Dude, I made so many changes to that build I'm not surprised there are discrepancies...I would show you my math, if I could remember it or I kept copies, but I just do it all over again each time and generally in different, convoluted and somewhat in</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:03:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>As you aren't actually showing your DPR formulas, you may have actually fixed these problems in your formulas, but:Your burning spray initial damage should be 36 + average 12 (you have 73 + average 12 listed).Your burning spray damage until you miss,</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24951693/Genasi_Scorcherer:_PEACH?post_id=452494477#452494477</link><description>As you aren't actually showing your DPR formulas, you may have actually fixed these problems in your formulas, but:Your burning spray initial damage should be 36 + average 12 (you have 73 + average 12 listed).Your burning spray damage until you miss,</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:24:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>&Acirc;&nbsp;1) This is unfortunately true... a legacy from when it was a pure sorc. D'oh EDIT: Fixed.2) If 14,000,000 is what we should have then the current king of DPR is ineligible... EDIT: Fixed.3) I'm assuming CA. Again, at this point, lol, I'm fine with</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24951693/Genasi_Scorcherer:_PEACH?post_id=451658817#451658817</link><description>&Acirc;&nbsp;1) This is unfortunately true... a legacy from when it was a pure sorc. D'oh EDIT: Fixed.2) If 14,000,000 is what we should have then the current king of DPR is ineligible... EDIT: Fixed.3) I'm assuming CA. Again, at this point, lol, I'm fine with</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:45:30 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
