New Posts For Thread: Polearm gamble and shift; answer from Customer Servicehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24059885/Polearm_gamble_and_shift;_answer_from_Customer_ServiceWith all the debate about how the two interact, I'm surprised no one asked wizards prior to me.  Customer (XXXXXXXX) 05/14/2010 06:44 PM The core rules question is: does an effect stating that a creature doesn't provoke opportunity attacks have anyAs there been any official reply from the devs on this topic?I'm currently DM'ing a campaign in which one of the players has picked Polearm Gamble feat and there has been a lot of discussion whether he can use PG on shifts, teleports and forced movemhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24059885/Polearm_gamble_and_shift;_answer_from_Customer_Service?post_id=525765055#525765055As there been any official reply from the devs on this topic?I'm currently DM'ing a campaign in which one of the players has picked Polearm Gamble feat and there has been a lot of discussion whether he can use PG on shifts, teleports and forced movemSun, 04 Nov 2012 08:22:18 -0600The issue of whether one could use polearm gamble creatures which have shifted or focebly moved into an adjacent square is one where a reasonable person could hold either opinion.But think about this: what does mean when we say 'Forced movement doeshttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24059885/Polearm_gamble_and_shift;_answer_from_Customer_Service?post_id=478081649#478081649The issue of whether one could use polearm gamble creatures which have shifted or focebly moved into an adjacent square is one where a reasonable person could hold either opinion.But think about this: what does mean when we say 'Forced movement doesTue, 14 Dec 2010 20:02:00 -0600Its kind of hard to see where the confusion about the feat comes from, since the feat states "When a non-adjacent enemy enters a square adjacent." There's nothing about movement or what have you in there. The reason it's an Opportunity attack is becahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24059885/Polearm_gamble_and_shift;_answer_from_Customer_Service?post_id=458818845#458818845Its kind of hard to see where the confusion about the feat comes from, since the feat states "When a non-adjacent enemy enters a square adjacent." There's nothing about movement or what have you in there. The reason it's an Opportunity attack is becaSun, 25 Jul 2010 03:27:12 -0500Has anyone heard back from Wizards with a ruling on this? I'm playing a Warden (MC Fighter) and hoping to make use of Polearm Gamble.My first reading of PG was that because the form of movement (i.e.: "Move" or "Shift") was not specified, by pure RAWhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24059885/Polearm_gamble_and_shift;_answer_from_Customer_Service?post_id=456568149#456568149Has anyone heard back from Wizards with a ruling on this? I'm playing a Warden (MC Fighter) and hoping to make use of Polearm Gamble.My first reading of PG was that because the form of movement (i.e.: "Move" or "Shift") was not specified, by pure RAWFri, 09 Jul 2010 22:18:26 -0500Ok: here's my opinion: i'm sorry if i'm rehashing at this point but i'm not sure that i understand certain people.**polearm gamble says:When a nonadjacent enemy enters asquare adjacent to you, you can make an opportunityattack with a polearm againsthttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/24059885/Polearm_gamble_and_shift;_answer_from_Customer_Service?post_id=455764477#455764477Ok: here's my opinion: i'm sorry if i'm rehashing at this point but i'm not sure that i understand certain people.**polearm gamble says:When a nonadjacent enemy enters asquare adjacent to you, you can make an opportunityattack with a polearm againstMon, 05 Jul 2010 03:57:20 -0500