<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Daze vs extra action</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22704405/Daze_vs_extra_action</link><description>Yesterday that happen in our weekly session.A lot of us were daze cause of a Grell. Then our bard asked us "Will you be able to use the extra action my power grants you to perform any non-violent action on your next turn if you are daze ?"And we all</description><item><title>Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, or a new thread or threads created in its place (or both).</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22704405/Daze_vs_extra_action?post_id=409356001#409356001</link><description>Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, or a new thread or threads created in its place (or both).</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:39:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Is it just me, or has this whole post devolved into personal attacks. Can we get this locked?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22704405/Daze_vs_extra_action?post_id=409354025#409354025</link><description>Is it just me, or has this whole post devolved into personal attacks. Can we get this locked?</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:24:12 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well Dane my longer question was done in all honesty, i didn't try to influence or force an answer like you seem to think. I tried to bring all the tricky components that this question has in with objectivity. I even said to you all Here my question.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22704405/Daze_vs_extra_action?post_id=409352165#409352165</link><description>Well Dane my longer question was done in all honesty, i didn't try to influence or force an answer like you seem to think. I tried to bring all the tricky components that this question has in with objectivity. I even said to you all Here my question.</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:09:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>My question to CS back on page 23 seems touse the wording in the book, and I don't feel I was trying to get a particular answer (because I don't need to be right... in fact, I'm usually wrong). :)I got the same answer Vel did, the AP rules are consid</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22704405/Daze_vs_extra_action?post_id=409339533#409339533</link><description>My question to CS back on page 23 seems touse the wording in the book, and I don't feel I was trying to get a particular answer (because I don't need to be right... in fact, I'm usually wrong). :)I got the same answer Vel did, the AP rules are consid</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:11:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>My question to CS back on page 23 seems touse the wording in the book, and I don't feel I was trying to get a particular answer (because I don't need to be right... in fact, I'm usually wrong). :)I got the same answer Vel did, the AP rules are consid</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22704405/Daze_vs_extra_action?post_id=409312669#409312669</link><description>My question to CS back on page 23 seems touse the wording in the book, and I don't feel I was trying to get a particular answer (because I don't need to be right... in fact, I'm usually wrong). :)I got the same answer Vel did, the AP rules are consid</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:33:58 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
