New Posts For Thread: Handbook of Broken discussion threadhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22591997/Handbook_of_Broken_discussion_threadThis thread is for discussion about the .TBD: Duplicate the definitions and goals section hereRending Tempest probably deserves a mention in bent. Not sure it is broken, since ramping it up would involve so many multi-attacks that a solo would probably die anyway. The issue it isn't a bonus, so it can keep stacking with itself. Every time youhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22591997/Handbook_of_Broken_discussion_thread?post_id=523846861#523846861Rending Tempest probably deserves a mention in bent. Not sure it is broken, since ramping it up would involve so many multi-attacks that a solo would probably die anyway. The issue it isn't a bonus, so it can keep stacking with itself. Every time youWed, 05 Sep 2012 22:20:40 -0500Exactly my thoughts. Now I don't need to feel like it's just me who's gone crazy or our group "doing it wrong". Thanks.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22591997/Handbook_of_Broken_discussion_thread?post_id=522549261#522549261Exactly my thoughts. Now I don't need to feel like it's just me who's gone crazy or our group "doing it wrong". Thanks.Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:51:33 -0500But to exceed 600 at lvl 30, using the resources mentioned, you don't need a setup to hit on 2s. You only need reasonably striker-ish PCs with a good damage/hit booster and reasonably good static modifiers and passive features. Using my own pally frohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22591997/Handbook_of_Broken_discussion_thread?post_id=522548983#522548983But to exceed 600 at lvl 30, using the resources mentioned, you don't need a setup to hit on 2s. You only need reasonably striker-ish PCs with a good damage/hit booster and reasonably good static modifiers and passive features. Using my own pally froThu, 02 Aug 2012 17:42:22 -0500That definition is... weird. "Optimized" at-will damage is roughly 90 at 30. At-will+At-will is 180 dpr, which is ~40 damage off of removing a standard from the board. Replace one of those at-wills with an encounter which should do 1.5x more damage,http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22591997/Handbook_of_Broken_discussion_thread?post_id=522547589#522547589That definition is... weird. "Optimized" at-will damage is roughly 90 at 30. At-will+At-will is 180 dpr, which is ~40 damage off of removing a standard from the board. Replace one of those at-wills with an encounter which should do 1.5x more damage,Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:01:52 -0500Just a thought, but doesn't this example put most (all?) large multiattacks squarely in the "Bent" category?[/quote]Most can't kill an elite or solo with an AP.If you look at the DPR king thread, there's not many that get 2 KPR in 2. (which is an elhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/22591997/Handbook_of_Broken_discussion_thread?post_id=522546661#522546661Just a thought, but doesn't this example put most (all?) large multiattacks squarely in the "Bent" category?[/quote]Most can't kill an elite or solo with an AP.If you look at the DPR king thread, there's not many that get 2 KPR in 2. (which is an elThu, 02 Aug 2012 16:37:13 -0500