<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 4th Edition Bard</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19935854/4th_Edition_Bard</link><description>After much thinking and work, I figured that leaving some of the old iconic classes out of the phb was kinda silly. It is also one of the main reasons that my groups are skeptical to move over to 4th edition. Most notably the lack of Barbarian, Druid</description><item><title>I want to see the compiled pdf but the links stopped working :(</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19935854/4th_Edition_Bard?post_id=516324321#516324321</link><description>I want to see the compiled pdf but the links stopped working :(</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:57:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>eh, to me, when you are re-imagining a class, you should look at the archetypes that inspired it. unfortunately i came across as thinking more about the historical truth than i really was, i was more concerned with the archetypes as such, the combina</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19935854/4th_Edition_Bard?post_id=340320678#340320678</link><description>eh, to me, when you are re-imagining a class, you should look at the archetypes that inspired it. unfortunately i came across as thinking more about the historical truth than i really was, i was more concerned with the archetypes as such, the combina</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:00:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>wands=conductor's batons:D</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19935854/4th_Edition_Bard?post_id=340320542#340320542</link><description>wands=conductor's batons:D</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:33:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Honestly, I really dont understand why you two are arguing over that. I mean, the bard is so very loosly based on real life anyways. Minstrils and such were the lowest members of the court usually, and of course in D&amp;D they are anything but. And of c</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19935854/4th_Edition_Bard?post_id=340320538#340320538</link><description>Honestly, I really dont understand why you two are arguing over that. I mean, the bard is so very loosly based on real life anyways. Minstrils and such were the lowest members of the court usually, and of course in D&amp;D they are anything but. And of c</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:32:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Seriously, explain how it is that it doesn't make sense for the skald to have streetwise. i don't mean that you're saying it makes no sense whatsoever, I'm just curious as why you think that it doesn't make a great deal of sense. and when you think o</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19935854/4th_Edition_Bard?post_id=340320530#340320530</link><description>Seriously, explain how it is that it doesn't make sense for the skald to have streetwise. i don't mean that you're saying it makes no sense whatsoever, I'm just curious as why you think that it doesn't make a great deal of sense. and when you think o</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:51:00 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
