<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Who's houseruling Alignments?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19930386/Whos_houseruling_Alignments</link><description>Well, officially D&amp;D has cut it's alignments down to five: Good, Evil, Lawful Good, Chaotic Evil and Unaligned.Now then, who's planning on ignoring the official alignment rules and just continue to have the Nine Alignments anyway?</description><item><title>Now I think in Chaos (and Law) like a new subsystem of taint like from "Heroes of Horror" (and oriental adventures or unearthed arcana). Law and Chaos aren&Acirc;&acute;t 3.X aligments again. Chaos is a crazy power spring wich is used by kaostouched creatures l</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19930386/Whos_houseruling_Alignments?post_id=340259778#340259778</link><description>Now I think in Chaos (and Law) like a new subsystem of taint like from "Heroes of Horror" (and oriental adventures or unearthed arcana). Law and Chaos aren&Acirc;&acute;t 3.X aligments again. Chaos is a crazy power spring wich is used by kaostouched creatures l</description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:46:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If you look close you will see that chaotic evil is describing two separate ways of thinking. What you are referring to seems to be the extreme "twisted" end.If you are chaotic evil under the 3.5 rules you should still be chaotic evil under the new r</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19930386/Whos_houseruling_Alignments?post_id=340259582#340259582</link><description>If you look close you will see that chaotic evil is describing two separate ways of thinking. What you are referring to seems to be the extreme "twisted" end.If you are chaotic evil under the 3.5 rules you should still be chaotic evil under the new r</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:36:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Personally I like how CE is defined in 4e even less than in previous editions, because a character has to be a slavering lunatic or some kind of extreme outsider to be CE. I like alignments to be open enough that any old human has a reasonable chance</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19930386/Whos_houseruling_Alignments?post_id=340259578#340259578</link><description>Personally I like how CE is defined in 4e even less than in previous editions, because a character has to be a slavering lunatic or some kind of extreme outsider to be CE. I like alignments to be open enough that any old human has a reasonable chance</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:02:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>OH YES OH GOD THANK YOUI'm just glad it's over. I don't care if it wasn't resolved.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19930386/Whos_houseruling_Alignments?post_id=340259554#340259554</link><description>OH YES OH GOD THANK YOUI'm just glad it's over. I don't care if it wasn't resolved.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:50:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Another fun example would be Suikoden II (video game RPG-- LOOKITUP!). The Hero and his best friend, Jowy, end up leading opposite sides of a war. They remain friends but their values are different-- the Hero believes in the individual freedom of the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19930386/Whos_houseruling_Alignments?post_id=340259546#340259546</link><description>Another fun example would be Suikoden II (video game RPG-- LOOKITUP!). The Hero and his best friend, Jowy, end up leading opposite sides of a war. They remain friends but their values are different-- the Hero believes in the individual freedom of the</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:20:21 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
