<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: ask a simple question, get a simple answer</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19873062/ask_a_simple_question,_get_a_simple_answer</link><description>The purpose of this thread is to serve as a catch-all for minor questions or mundane rules queries that don't really warrant a new thread here at the CharOp boards (and thus in a way, hopefully reduce the clutter of redundant threads on the board). I</description><item><title>A8316: Yes. For more proof, show the DM the section of Complete Arcane (might be Complete Mage) where it specifically mentions the feats Weapon Focus (Ray) and Weapon Specialization (Ray).</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19873062/ask_a_simple_question,_get_a_simple_answer?post_id=532743907#532743907</link><description>A8316: Yes. For more proof, show the DM the section of Complete Arcane (might be Complete Mage) where it specifically mentions the feats Weapon Focus (Ray) and Weapon Specialization (Ray).</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:18:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Q8316Is a ray delivered as a ranged touch attack considered "using a ranged weapon"? The PrC spellwarped sniper got "point-blank shot" as a pre.req feat and my friend playing it claims that the +1 from the feat also benefit him when shooting ray-spel</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19873062/ask_a_simple_question,_get_a_simple_answer?post_id=532742601#532742601</link><description>Q8316Is a ray delivered as a ranged touch attack considered "using a ranged weapon"? The PrC spellwarped sniper got "point-blank shot" as a pre.req feat and my friend playing it claims that the +1 from the feat also benefit him when shooting ray-spel</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 15:19:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>A8315: Any combination of 3 Metamagic and/or item creation feats.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19873062/ask_a_simple_question,_get_a_simple_answer?post_id=530873257#530873257</link><description>A8315: Any combination of 3 Metamagic and/or item creation feats.</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 23:30:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Q8315: Loremaster needs 3 metamagic feats or item creation feats to qualify, does it mean that i can qualify with 2 metamagic + 1 item creation or 1 metamagic + 2 item creation?Or can i only qualify with all 3 in one type (metamagic or item creation)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19873062/ask_a_simple_question,_get_a_simple_answer?post_id=530873173#530873173</link><description>Q8315: Loremaster needs 3 metamagic feats or item creation feats to qualify, does it mean that i can qualify with 2 metamagic + 1 item creation or 1 metamagic + 2 item creation?Or can i only qualify with all 3 in one type (metamagic or item creation)</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 23:21:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Q8314: Witch contingencies for Disjunction could you use to prevent the destruction of a magic item?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19873062/ask_a_simple_question,_get_a_simple_answer?post_id=530251521#530251521</link><description>Q8314: Witch contingencies for Disjunction could you use to prevent the destruction of a magic item?</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 04:21:39 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
