New Posts For Thread: Wizards DO Suckhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19739854/Wizards_DO_SuckEveryone,At last I am ready to post some of the research I have been talking about with regard to the wizard. Some of the comments and numbers Squirrelloid has shown in the Char-Op forums have been invaluable guides, but they largely confirmed whatActually, I have never played the miniature game ... :) Well, what I love best about my wizard though, is still the role-playing ... of it ... our homebrew campaign is very interactive and innovative ... love the role-playing aspects of it ...But Ihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19739854/Wizards_DO_Suck?post_id=336101650#336101650Actually, I have never played the miniature game ... :) Well, what I love best about my wizard though, is still the role-playing ... of it ... our homebrew campaign is very interactive and innovative ... love the role-playing aspects of it ...But IMon, 25 Aug 2008 07:30:03 -0500The Wizard is definitely NOT a Striker. Or even a Defender. But, I have to say that I much prefer the War Wizard type to the Controller type, now that I've had a bit of experience playing the game. The reason is because, if you don't aim to be a Chttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19739854/Wizards_DO_Suck?post_id=336101646#336101646The Wizard is definitely NOT a Striker. Or even a Defender. But, I have to say that I much prefer the War Wizard type to the Controller type, now that I've had a bit of experience playing the game. The reason is because, if you don't aim to be a CMon, 25 Aug 2008 07:21:30 -0500Hi, I am currently playing a "war" wizard and somehow, I feel that I can't really contribute much to the party in terms of damage. I am thinking of switching to a "control" wizard though .... :) It seems to be that the 4ed wizard is better offhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19739854/Wizards_DO_Suck?post_id=336101642#336101642Hi, I am currently playing a "war" wizard and somehow, I feel that I can't really contribute much to the party in terms of damage. I am thinking of switching to a "control" wizard though .... :) It seems to be that the 4ed wizard is better offMon, 25 Aug 2008 05:27:16 -0500Wizards arnt ment to be the ones in the front dealing the damage. they are ment to eaken the incoming for your fighters. An there rituals make up hugely for the lack of damage. IF USED RIGHThttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19739854/Wizards_DO_Suck?post_id=336101638#336101638Wizards arnt ment to be the ones in the front dealing the damage. they are ment to eaken the incoming for your fighters. An there rituals make up hugely for the lack of damage. IF USED RIGHTSun, 24 Aug 2008 15:17:30 -0500Bunnies & Burrows!!!!!:Dhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19739854/Wizards_DO_Suck?post_id=336100982#336100982Bunnies & Burrows!!!!!:DTue, 05 Aug 2008 22:29:20 -0500