<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Commander's Strike Issue</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19737754/Commanders_Strike_Issue</link><description>I am a little confused by Commander's Strike and find it a little boring if I am reading right.From my understanding, the warlord can use this ability to give another player a basic attack. Does the Warlord actually get to attack also, or does this</description><item><title>Use a polearm with a warlord. Fix'd.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19737754/Commanders_Strike_Issue?post_id=387120857#387120857</link><description>Use a polearm with a warlord. Fix'd.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:33:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Not in this case, I want to play a tactical warlord, an competent battle leader who issues commands bolsters allies while also leading by example. Like a bard, a warlord can rally the team to win a fight. He is supposed to be a skilled warrior with a</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19737754/Commanders_Strike_Issue?post_id=336056158#336056158</link><description>Not in this case, I want to play a tactical warlord, an competent battle leader who issues commands bolsters allies while also leading by example. Like a bard, a warlord can rally the team to win a fight. He is supposed to be a skilled warrior with a</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:55:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Do you realize that you want to play a bard?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19737754/Commanders_Strike_Issue?post_id=336056138#336056138</link><description>Do you realize that you want to play a bard?</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:15:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Inapropriate sarcasm. Who say that some, even many warlord powers aren't approprite where the warlord has to be close to an ally or an enemy? Even thge FAQ does no require that the warlord be next to the ally for Commander's Strike, just that the tar</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19737754/Commanders_Strike_Issue?post_id=336056126#336056126</link><description>Inapropriate sarcasm. Who say that some, even many warlord powers aren't approprite where the warlord has to be close to an ally or an enemy? Even thge FAQ does no require that the warlord be next to the ally for Commander's Strike, just that the tar</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:31:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Dude, what was I thinking, a warlord power where you have to be next to an ally? He doesn't have any powers like that, and if he did, they'd likely be pretty horrible. You get two at-wills dude. Guess what though, there all, for the most part, bes</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19737754/Commanders_Strike_Issue?post_id=336056102#336056102</link><description>Dude, what was I thinking, a warlord power where you have to be next to an ally? He doesn't have any powers like that, and if he did, they'd likely be pretty horrible. You get two at-wills dude. Guess what though, there all, for the most part, bes</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:37:56 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
