New Posts For Thread: Stealth - the low downhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19725894/Stealth_-_the_low_downAlso on Enworld. Based on best available evidence (WotC_Mearls, CSR, RAW) here's how you can run Stealth.1. Stealth does not upgrade Cover to Superior Cover, or Concealment to Total Concealment. Stealth does not connect with Targeting What You Can'tMost of this thread is dated before 9th of July 2008 and thus written before stealth-errata. Therefore I would ignore this thread and reread Stealth-errata if you have doubts/questions about stealth.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19725894/Stealth_-_the_low_down?post_id=335875110#335875110Most of this thread is dated before 9th of July 2008 and thus written before stealth-errata. Therefore I would ignore this thread and reread Stealth-errata if you have doubts/questions about stealth.Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:54:23 -0500I just wanted to ask for a bit of clarification. The errata for the player's handbook says stealth is "at the end of a move action." This is much different from the original phb where it states stealth can happen during any action.A common occuranchttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19725894/Stealth_-_the_low_down?post_id=335875094#335875094I just wanted to ask for a bit of clarification. The errata for the player's handbook says stealth is "at the end of a move action." This is much different from the original phb where it states stealth can happen during any action.A common occurancWed, 01 Oct 2008 01:12:30 -0500Firstly, props to vk for compiling the info and coming up with a concised set of rules for stealth. I especially like the fact how it's simplified to reduce dice rolling yet retains an overall sense of logic (i totally agree on how stealth is not invhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19725894/Stealth_-_the_low_down?post_id=335875082#335875082Firstly, props to vk for compiling the info and coming up with a concised set of rules for stealth. I especially like the fact how it's simplified to reduce dice rolling yet retains an overall sense of logic (i totally agree on how stealth is not invTue, 30 Sep 2008 21:29:02 -0500What? I don't see how you can say this. His remarks in this regard are incredibly vague. Now, I don't intend this to be a criticism as it was not his intention to make a ruling on anything with those comments. To be honest, I think the best way thttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19725894/Stealth_-_the_low_down?post_id=335874458#335874458What? I don't see how you can say this. His remarks in this regard are incredibly vague. Now, I don't intend this to be a criticism as it was not his intention to make a ruling on anything with those comments. To be honest, I think the best way tTue, 08 Jul 2008 12:27:40 -0500But you are adding words. You are giving the act of pointing a stealthed character out to allies a mechanical meaning, when it inherently has none. Technically, this "pointing out" mumbo jumbo does exactly nothing.By extension, this means that I'm alhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19725894/Stealth_-_the_low_down?post_id=335874454#335874454But you are adding words. You are giving the act of pointing a stealthed character out to allies a mechanical meaning, when it inherently has none. Technically, this "pointing out" mumbo jumbo does exactly nothing.By extension, this means that I'm alTue, 08 Jul 2008 10:49:37 -0500