http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19690882/Complaints:_Sexist_artwork.So I pick up my 4e Player's Handbook the other day and I immediately have to heave a huge sigh. Not in protest to the release of a new edition, but because the Wizard on the cover has her midriff exposed, is flashing us a little thigh, and has reallyhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19690882/Complaints:_Sexist_artwork.?post_id=334904726#334904726This thread has been closed for extensive harassment, baiting, and flaming. It will be submitted to CM for review.Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:26:26 -0500http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19690882/Complaints:_Sexist_artwork.?post_id=334904714#334904714Thats what sexism is. Sexism is the unfair treatment based on sex, ie a woman not getting promoted because she is a woman is sexist. If the art showed all women as needing men it would be sexist. Women that look sexy is not sexist because the menSat, 28 Jun 2008 17:23:41 -0500http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19690882/Complaints:_Sexist_artwork.?post_id=334904698#334904698Fashion and beauty magazines have nothing to do with this. I only care about the art in the PHB and the ridiculous sexist armor they keep drawing on females.Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:18:14 -0500http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19690882/Complaints:_Sexist_artwork.?post_id=334904694#334904694So drawings of imaginary women with a bit of skin showing are sexist, but actual pictures of real women that are almost naked are fine? Please explain this.Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:14:52 -0500http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19690882/Complaints:_Sexist_artwork.?post_id=334904690#334904690Except my argument is the right position. Nothing else matters other than the unrealistic armor that perpetuates the attitude that women are sex objects. Stupid, totally unrealistic armor needs to go.Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:14:39 -0500