New Posts For Thread: Da Bleeder - 96 ongoing damage without needing to-hithttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19647790/Da_Bleeder_-_96_ongoing_damage_without_needing_to-hitThe idea for this came from an idea I had on the thread of optimizing missing. The class will do insane amounts of damage without worrying about hitting at all. Nice, eh?It's playable at all levels, but it comes into its own at 16th level, and becomeGood combo. Higher level than the sample build, though.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19647790/Da_Bleeder_-_96_ongoing_damage_without_needing_to-hit?post_id=511974011#511974011Good combo. Higher level than the sample build, though.Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:32:15 -0500Sorry for bumping this, but I just wanted to add....Why has no one thought of using Bleed Away in combination with Skewering Shot!? Yeah you need a thrown weapon, but in return your target now has a choice to make. They can negate 6 slides but take 6http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19647790/Da_Bleeder_-_96_ongoing_damage_without_needing_to-hit?post_id=511963949#511963949Sorry for bumping this, but I just wanted to add....Why has no one thought of using Bleed Away in combination with Skewering Shot!? Yeah you need a thrown weapon, but in return your target now has a choice to make. They can negate 6 slides but take 6Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:36:59 -0500Ok, I am thinking out loud here and I haven't tried it...but would this work with an Executioner instead of a Ranger, and a Vryloka or Drow? Particularly with the Executioner's ability to ignore Poison resistance and immunities a creature may have.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19647790/Da_Bleeder_-_96_ongoing_damage_without_needing_to-hit?post_id=506735069#506735069Ok, I am thinking out loud here and I haven't tried it...but would this work with an Executioner instead of a Ranger, and a Vryloka or Drow? Particularly with the Executioner's ability to ignore Poison resistance and immunities a creature may have.Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:12:39 -0500Yes, you are correct. I meant that. Same source o types do not stack.Thing is, "Hit:" states what happen if you hit with one attack. Not with all three attacks together. If you hit more than once, say 3 times, you apply the Hit Line 3 times. Not thhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19647790/Da_Bleeder_-_96_ongoing_damage_without_needing_to-hit?post_id=492350321#492350321Yes, you are correct. I meant that. Same source o types do not stack.Thing is, "Hit:" states what happen if you hit with one attack. Not with all three attacks together. If you hit more than once, say 3 times, you apply the Hit Line 3 times. Not thTue, 12 Apr 2011 19:23:35 -0500If I understand your contention correctly, you're saying that the individual 10 (or 20) ongoing from each miss (or hit) with Bleed Away shouldn't stack, because they're from the same source?I can see it being read either way, and in my head it boilshttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19647790/Da_Bleeder_-_96_ongoing_damage_without_needing_to-hit?post_id=492321261#492321261If I understand your contention correctly, you're saying that the individual 10 (or 20) ongoing from each miss (or hit) with Bleed Away shouldn't stack, because they're from the same source?I can see it being read either way, and in my head it boilsTue, 12 Apr 2011 14:07:53 -0500