New Posts For Thread: 4E Class Discussionhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19601614/4E_Class_DiscussionThis thread is for discussion classes in 4th Edition.Hellsbells, I'm going to give you the benefit of doubt.Dragonborn is the new draconic race. They have the same name as a 3.5 draconic race, but bear not other significant similarity to that other race. Dragonborn are not half-dragons. They were creathttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19601614/4E_Class_Discussion?post_id=333670014#333670014Hellsbells, I'm going to give you the benefit of doubt.Dragonborn is the new draconic race. They have the same name as a 3.5 draconic race, but bear not other significant similarity to that other race. Dragonborn are not half-dragons. They were creatTue, 13 May 2008 18:31:28 -0500I know this isnt technically the right place to post it but I have a question. I have been told that the Tiefling and a draconic race would both be in the players handbook. The tiefling has been of course confirmed but I cant find any information onhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19601614/4E_Class_Discussion?post_id=333669986#333669986I know this isnt technically the right place to post it but I have a question. I have been told that the Tiefling and a draconic race would both be in the players handbook. The tiefling has been of course confirmed but I cant find any information onTue, 13 May 2008 17:43:49 -0500There is something to be said for making characters that are "playable", but I think it's in error for a DM to wax a character b/c of a players personal preference. The game is supposed to be fun, right? Whats the point in making a character that yhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19601614/4E_Class_Discussion?post_id=333669374#333669374There is something to be said for making characters that are "playable", but I think it's in error for a DM to wax a character b/c of a players personal preference. The game is supposed to be fun, right? Whats the point in making a character that ySat, 03 May 2008 16:32:15 -0500No Cleric and Druid are part of the core rules. When we played in the WLD we had 2 Clerics of level 18, a Barbarian 19 (turned into a protectar), an Archmage 18, and 17th Aasimar Paladin. The DM did not have to go through 10 books to find out what whttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19601614/4E_Class_Discussion?post_id=333669370#333669370No Cleric and Druid are part of the core rules. When we played in the WLD we had 2 Clerics of level 18, a Barbarian 19 (turned into a protectar), an Archmage 18, and 17th Aasimar Paladin. The DM did not have to go through 10 books to find out what wSat, 03 May 2008 15:42:43 -0500You don't like powergamers. Does this mean you don't let people play Cleric 20 or Druid 20 builds, both of which are more broken in and of themselves than darn near anything you can do with a melee character?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19601614/4E_Class_Discussion?post_id=333669366#333669366You don't like powergamers. Does this mean you don't let people play Cleric 20 or Druid 20 builds, both of which are more broken in and of themselves than darn near anything you can do with a melee character?Thu, 01 May 2008 00:43:30 -0500