New Posts For Thread: 4E Organized Playhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19581366/4E_Organized_PlayHere’s the thread to share your thoughts and ideas about the 4E Organized Play programs.Well, I am walking away at this point. I have paid for over 40 books to get into 3rd edition. I did not do so because I loved 3rd edition or felt it was needed, but because I was excited about the living greyhawk system and how it made gameplay somehhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19581366/4E_Organized_Play?post_id=332843246#332843246Well, I am walking away at this point. I have paid for over 40 books to get into 3rd edition. I did not do so because I loved 3rd edition or felt it was needed, but because I was excited about the living greyhawk system and how it made gameplay somehSun, 02 Dec 2007 21:01:52 -0600Actually they will HAVE to financially compensate writers, as they will need to fully own the material, not "borrow" it as they have been with LG. Now, will they compensate administrators for non-writing tasks (like editing, POC duties, etc)? That'http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19581366/4E_Organized_Play?post_id=332842990#332842990Actually they will HAVE to financially compensate writers, as they will need to fully own the material, not "borrow" it as they have been with LG. Now, will they compensate administrators for non-writing tasks (like editing, POC duties, etc)? That'Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:50:44 -0500Could it be that with the new approach to give PCs more to do that Greyhawk wouldn't be the same under the 4E system?Of all of the Living Greyhawk gamers at Dragon*con this weekend only about 25% plan to go with a 4E Living Campaign. The rest are lohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19581366/4E_Organized_Play?post_id=332842986#332842986Could it be that with the new approach to give PCs more to do that Greyhawk wouldn't be the same under the 4E system?Of all of the Living Greyhawk gamers at Dragon*con this weekend only about 25% plan to go with a 4E Living Campaign. The rest are loWed, 05 Sep 2007 13:40:07 -0500If they want to exclude Mac and Linux users from authoring for or administrating the setting. Okay.But I doubt highly that their online tools will be as robust as Word for collaborative authoring, editing, commenting, and layout. Because the files wihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19581366/4E_Organized_Play?post_id=332842982#332842982If they want to exclude Mac and Linux users from authoring for or administrating the setting. Okay.But I doubt highly that their online tools will be as robust as Word for collaborative authoring, editing, commenting, and layout. Because the files wiTue, 04 Sep 2007 20:44:01 -0500Except that part of the functionality that the online tools are supposed to be provided are encounter builders, mapping tools, and other programs designed to make a DM or adventure builder's job easier. If they're doing all the work in the tools inhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19581366/4E_Organized_Play?post_id=332842978#332842978Except that part of the functionality that the online tools are supposed to be provided are encounter builders, mapping tools, and other programs designed to make a DM or adventure builder's job easier. If they're doing all the work in the tools inTue, 04 Sep 2007 19:20:56 -0500