New Posts For Thread: Anyone else want to play one power source campaigns?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18836150/Anyone_else_want_to_play_one_power_source_campaignsOriginally I accidentally posted this in the classes forums:I think that an all martial, all-divine, all-arcane, or all-primal party and/or campaign would be very interesting.Example:The nation's wizard's guild have sent 4 of their best to investigatI must say, I am also on board with the whole one power source idea. I probably won't do it on my firs campaign, but I definitely will keep it in mind. And thus far, I can't think of a power source I don't want to try. I think my first **** geniushttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18836150/Anyone_else_want_to_play_one_power_source_campaigns?post_id=321023502#321023502I must say, I am also on board with the whole one power source idea. I probably won't do it on my firs campaign, but I definitely will keep it in mind. And thus far, I can't think of a power source I don't want to try. I think my first **** geniusMon, 24 Mar 2008 22:03:27 -0500Since I prefer my campaigns to be low-magic, the idea of a Conan-esqe martial campaign would be very, very useful...as well as putting wizards back in their place as power-mad, demon-summoning bad guys.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18836150/Anyone_else_want_to_play_one_power_source_campaigns?post_id=321023366#321023366Since I prefer my campaigns to be low-magic, the idea of a Conan-esqe martial campaign would be very, very useful...as well as putting wizards back in their place as power-mad, demon-summoning bad guys.Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:28:18 -0500The only issue I can see with this is the fact that WotC isn't going to fill all possible roles. If you are comfortable homebrewing classes, however, it should be fine. That said, waiting until the PHB2 and several Power books have been released mihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18836150/Anyone_else_want_to_play_one_power_source_campaigns?post_id=321023322#321023322The only issue I can see with this is the fact that WotC isn't going to fill all possible roles. If you are comfortable homebrewing classes, however, it should be fine. That said, waiting until the PHB2 and several Power books have been released miTue, 11 Mar 2008 20:59:00 -0500I like that idea quite a lot.In 3.5, I would always argue with my players that they shouldn't tell each other what class they intended to play when we were starting a new campaign and creating new PCs, because I knew they would not select the same clhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18836150/Anyone_else_want_to_play_one_power_source_campaigns?post_id=321023318#321023318I like that idea quite a lot.In 3.5, I would always argue with my players that they shouldn't tell each other what class they intended to play when we were starting a new campaign and creating new PCs, because I knew they would not select the same clTue, 11 Mar 2008 10:47:22 -0500With 4e rules being even more elegant than 3.x in structure, these kinds of campaigns should only be easier to run. You could do it before, sure, but now there's some things now that really make it more practical from a "running the campaign" perspehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18836150/Anyone_else_want_to_play_one_power_source_campaigns?post_id=321023314#321023314With 4e rules being even more elegant than 3.x in structure, these kinds of campaigns should only be easier to run. You could do it before, sure, but now there's some things now that really make it more practical from a "running the campaign" perspeMon, 10 Mar 2008 12:30:37 -0500