<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dragon 364-Wolves of Maldeen</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834930/Dragon_364-Wolves_of_Maldeen</link><description>Man everything in this article rocks. The writing is top notch. The concept of a "lone wolf" ronin type character who uses guerrilla tactics to fight evil is great, and all the game mechanics rock.As a player I would pretty much want every magic item</description><item><title>It was nice to see the Class Acts: Wizards powers get and errata in the final PDF of Dragon 364.I was disappointed to see that the Wolves of Maldeen article didn't get the same treatment.The Straw Soldiers power raises several questions to me, by the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834930/Dragon_364-Wolves_of_Maldeen?post_id=320999510#320999510</link><description>It was nice to see the Class Acts: Wizards powers get and errata in the final PDF of Dragon 364.I was disappointed to see that the Wolves of Maldeen article didn't get the same treatment.The Straw Soldiers power raises several questions to me, by the</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:10:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Diversity of options doesn't need to mean diversity of mechanics. In 3.x, depending on your class you're essentially playing a different game.I wouldn't blame the "business model" for that.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834930/Dragon_364-Wolves_of_Maldeen?post_id=320999462#320999462</link><description>Diversity of options doesn't need to mean diversity of mechanics. In 3.x, depending on your class you're essentially playing a different game.I wouldn't blame the "business model" for that.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:33:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I guess its a matter of taste again. I saw your bloat as diversity and options for PCs and NPCs.But with the Martial book coming soon, the FR setting, the Manual of the planes, the online Dragon mag, etc, I think that a rules bloat/power creaps are j</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834930/Dragon_364-Wolves_of_Maldeen?post_id=320999438#320999438</link><description>I guess its a matter of taste again. I saw your bloat as diversity and options for PCs and NPCs.But with the Martial book coming soon, the FR setting, the Manual of the planes, the online Dragon mag, etc, I think that a rules bloat/power creaps are j</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:17:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well...after seeing the rules bloat in 3.x, I'm wary of any new sub-systems of mechanics, especially in an online article.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834930/Dragon_364-Wolves_of_Maldeen?post_id=320999434#320999434</link><description>Well...after seeing the rules bloat in 3.x, I'm wary of any new sub-systems of mechanics, especially in an online article.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:44:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe I'm just tired of goodly organization. They lack something generaly, but that is a matter of taste.Well, yes I am asking for a sub-system. Just another ritual, that would be ordinary. It would be another divination spell. I would elaborate on b</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834930/Dragon_364-Wolves_of_Maldeen?post_id=320999430#320999430</link><description>Maybe I'm just tired of goodly organization. They lack something generaly, but that is a matter of taste.Well, yes I am asking for a sub-system. Just another ritual, that would be ordinary. It would be another divination spell. I would elaborate on b</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:21:59 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
