<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Marking Marked and Other 4E-isms</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834794/Marking_Marked_and_Other_4E-isms</link><description>That's right, my friends: 4E combat is so simple, that it only takes 37 kinds of beads and counters to keep track of what's happening in game.Seriously, though, I don't understand why they're giving characters all of these abilities that only work on</description><item><title>Nevermind.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834794/Marking_Marked_and_Other_4E-isms?post_id=320996386#320996386</link><description>Nevermind.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:25:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks for the updates, HC.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834794/Marking_Marked_and_Other_4E-isms?post_id=320996322#320996322</link><description>Thanks for the updates, HC.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:26:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'll point out here that the DDXP marks appear not to be the final versions of the marks. The fighter's mark has consequences beyond the -2 attack. And the paladin's mark (among other things) requires the paladin to actively work to maintain it - so</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834794/Marking_Marked_and_Other_4E-isms?post_id=320996318#320996318</link><description>I'll point out here that the DDXP marks appear not to be the final versions of the marks. The fighter's mark has consequences beyond the -2 attack. And the paladin's mark (among other things) requires the paladin to actively work to maintain it - so</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:15:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Based on DDXP it would work as follows:FIGHTER - I use my mark on the BBEG.(BBEG is marked and -2 to attacks not involving the fighter)PALADIN - I use my mark on the BBEG(BBEG loses Fighter's Mark, has -2 to attacks and 8 damage for attacks not invol</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834794/Marking_Marked_and_Other_4E-isms?post_id=320996314#320996314</link><description>Based on DDXP it would work as follows:FIGHTER - I use my mark on the BBEG.(BBEG is marked and -2 to attacks not involving the fighter)PALADIN - I use my mark on the BBEG(BBEG loses Fighter's Mark, has -2 to attacks and 8 damage for attacks not invol</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:31:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well, I tried that, but then all my players started doing it. Kinda par for the course, really.Sorta back on topic, if the Pally uses his Mark for damage (AoE, right?) and then the Ftr steals it, on the next turn, can't the Pally load it up again?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18834794/Marking_Marked_and_Other_4E-isms?post_id=320996310#320996310</link><description>Well, I tried that, but then all my players started doing it. Kinda par for the course, really.Sorta back on topic, if the Pally uses his Mark for damage (AoE, right?) and then the Ftr steals it, on the next turn, can't the Pally load it up again?</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:27:35 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
