New Posts For Thread: Thread regarding "points of light"http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18833402/Thread_regarding_34;points_of_light34;I couldn't find the appropriate place to post this comment. This is directly related to the 4E default campaign setting, "points of light" article found here: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drdd/20070829aPlease note that this is not politicWell sure, if you're looking at the phrase in that context.I don't see how any of those describe a campaign world as opposed to just a campaign."Points of light," however, does. Vast wilderness, without a unified civilization. Points of light scatterhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18833402/Thread_regarding_34;points_of_light34;?post_id=320983922#320983922Well sure, if you're looking at the phrase in that context.I don't see how any of those describe a campaign world as opposed to just a campaign."Points of light," however, does. Vast wilderness, without a unified civilization. Points of light scatterThu, 30 Aug 2007 20:06:28 -0500Thanks for the interesting commentary, everyone.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18833402/Thread_regarding_34;points_of_light34;?post_id=320983906#320983906Thanks for the interesting commentary, everyone.Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:58:55 -0500The new setting is not just talking about "points of light." It's also talking about "a dangerous world." Obviously, this is in reference to the ill-fated 1992 Dangerous World Tour by Michael Jackson, when the controversial allegations against himhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18833402/Thread_regarding_34;points_of_light34;?post_id=320983902#320983902The new setting is not just talking about "points of light." It's also talking about "a dangerous world." Obviously, this is in reference to the ill-fated 1992 Dangerous World Tour by Michael Jackson, when the controversial allegations against himThu, 30 Aug 2007 11:46:40 -0500The use of the term in the article has precisely two things to do with any of what you referenced: "****" and "all". You post makes about as much sense as suggesting Ronald Reagan's "Tear down this wall!" is a Pink Floyd reference.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18833402/Thread_regarding_34;points_of_light34;?post_id=320983898#320983898The use of the term in the article has precisely two things to do with any of what you referenced: "****" and "all". You post makes about as much sense as suggesting Ronald Reagan's "Tear down this wall!" is a Pink Floyd reference.Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:35:11 -0500Notice that Bush's speach used the term "a thousand points of light" The article you mention has a slight variation on that but it should be enough to be able to see that it is not refering to Bush's speach.While it is arguable that the writer of thahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/18833402/Thread_regarding_34;points_of_light34;?post_id=320983894#320983894Notice that Bush's speach used the term "a thousand points of light" The article you mention has a slight variation on that but it should be enough to be able to see that it is not refering to Bush's speach.While it is arguable that the writer of thaThu, 30 Aug 2007 11:04:01 -0500