<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Updated Rulebook Questions (ALL)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75866/27727665/Updated_Rulebook_Questions_(ALL)</link><description>I thought I'd start a single thread for all new DDM Rulebook Questions.  So please feel free to post all of your questions here so that we have a single thread to cover all questions.  Thanks.  I'll start off with one:Is the change to Area Attack rul</description><item><title>I also like the way the area attack rules are now written, whether it is closer to 4th edt or not.  I always felt artillery pieces were far too strong in DDM2</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75866/27727665/Updated_Rulebook_Questions_(ALL)?post_id=498107849#498107849</link><description>I also like the way the area attack rules are now written, whether it is closer to 4th edt or not.  I always felt artillery pieces were far too strong in DDM2</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:24:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What is funny is that by a rule misunderstanding we were playing "Area Attacks"this way till the beginning of 2.0. (Except for the Range 10)I only noticed our mistake a few weeks ago !!!...And I can tell you this new rule (For you, very old for us) i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75866/27727665/Updated_Rulebook_Questions_(ALL)?post_id=498069453#498069453</link><description>What is funny is that by a rule misunderstanding we were playing "Area Attacks"this way till the beginning of 2.0. (Except for the Range 10)I only noticed our mistake a few weeks ago !!!...And I can tell you this new rule (For you, very old for us) i</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:02:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>3. Totally.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75866/27727665/Updated_Rulebook_Questions_(ALL)?post_id=498019165#498019165</link><description>3. Totally.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:04:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I prefer option 2, but I can understand how option 3 is cleaner. Interesting change to be certain.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75866/27727665/Updated_Rulebook_Questions_(ALL)?post_id=498017389#498017389</link><description>I prefer option 2, but I can understand how option 3 is cleaner. Interesting change to be certain.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:43:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is perfectly clear to me.  Easy to understand and easy to explain.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75866/27727665/Updated_Rulebook_Questions_(ALL)?post_id=497862845#497862845</link><description>This is perfectly clear to me.  Easy to understand and easy to explain.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:06:34 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
