<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Please Lock Forum</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/26001573/Please_Lock_Forum</link><description>I would like to request that this forum and sub-forumsbe locked (read-only) because the Official LFR Forumis another forum. This will help to complete migration.community.wizards.com/lfr/go/forum/viewb...</description><item><title>Would it at least be possible to unsticky the outdated threads?For example, "LFR CCG 1.99 ... draft copy has been released"is out of date and does not need to remain as a sticky thread.This request holds for all three of the legacy LFR forum areas.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/26001573/Please_Lock_Forum?post_id=488291473#488291473</link><description>Would it at least be possible to unsticky the outdated threads?For example, "LFR CCG 1.99 ... draft copy has been released"is out of date and does not need to remain as a sticky thread.This request holds for all three of the legacy LFR forum areas.</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:10:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Asking people to "relearn" something doesn't seem like a good idea.  Especially since new players aren't even aware that they should be searching for groups instead of forums.As Benird mentions, people are going to look for "Forums".  They don't know</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/26001573/Please_Lock_Forum?post_id=473420245#473420245</link><description>Asking people to "relearn" something doesn't seem like a good idea.  Especially since new players aren't even aware that they should be searching for groups instead of forums.As Benird mentions, people are going to look for "Forums".  They don't know</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:32:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Asking people to "relearn" something doesn't seem like a good idea. &Acirc;&nbsp;Especially since new players aren't even aware that they should be searching for groups instead of forums.As&Acirc;&nbsp;Benird mentions, people are going to look for "Forums". &Acirc;&nbsp;They don't k</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/26001573/Please_Lock_Forum?post_id=472918745#472918745</link><description>Asking people to "relearn" something doesn't seem like a good idea. &Acirc;&nbsp;Especially since new players aren't even aware that they should be searching for groups instead of forums.As&Acirc;&nbsp;Benird mentions, people are going to look for "Forums". &Acirc;&nbsp;They don't k</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:10:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That's all fine and good for people who know that the wizards site is structured by groups. However I'd say that the majority of internet users, who visit the site, have never been to the Wizards site before or if they have it was to look up basic in</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/26001573/Please_Lock_Forum?post_id=472725341#472725341</link><description>That's all fine and good for people who know that the wizards site is structured by groups. However I'd say that the majority of internet users, who visit the site, have never been to the Wizards site before or if they have it was to look up basic in</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:19:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hmmm, if you are only interested in forums, then this location is fewer clicks, BUT if you are interested in the news/blogs, the Group is more useful and the same number of clicks.Instead of clicking on Forums, click on Groups.The third largest Group</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/26001573/Please_Lock_Forum?post_id=472696257#472696257</link><description>Hmmm, if you are only interested in forums, then this location is fewer clicks, BUT if you are interested in the news/blogs, the Group is more useful and the same number of clicks.Instead of clicking on Forums, click on Groups.The third largest Group</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:13:38 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
