<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Wrong characters for the fight? What should be expected?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/24921793/Wrong_characters_for_the_fight_What_should_be_expected</link><description>I play with a regular group, and although composition often varies   slightly, we normally try to create parties with a reasonable amount of   balance. So we're in a better position than a few of the groups thrown   together randomly at a convention,</description><item><title>That particular scenario would avoid the whole non-lethal damage in 3E as well considering the monsters in question drain constititution in 3E ;)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/24921793/Wrong_characters_for_the_fight_What_should_be_expected?post_id=451103789#451103789</link><description>That particular scenario would avoid the whole non-lethal damage in 3E as well considering the monsters in question drain constititution in 3E ;)</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:30:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There is at least one fight out there where the players want to take something alive and might be unable to due to other monsters. It'sa nice idea but the rules don't support it very well imo.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/24921793/Wrong_characters_for_the_fight_What_should_be_expected?post_id=450989197#450989197</link><description>There is at least one fight out there where the players want to take something alive and might be unable to due to other monsters. It'sa nice idea but the rules don't support it very well imo.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:31:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In my experience non-lethal damage was just as hard in 3E as in 4E, especially if one PC wants to keep something alive and another does not. The same discussion arose (to kill or not to kill), and the only difference was that in 3E you potentially co</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/24921793/Wrong_characters_for_the_fight_What_should_be_expected?post_id=450947337#450947337</link><description>In my experience non-lethal damage was just as hard in 3E as in 4E, especially if one PC wants to keep something alive and another does not. The same discussion arose (to kill or not to kill), and the only difference was that in 3E you potentially co</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:13:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Our Group has blacklisted one of those mentioned in this thread. I personally wouldn't rate it as low as 'Something of Value' from LG but...Spoiler: &#xD; &#xD; Show&#xD; &#xD; Corm1-4. Yes the tactics make it theoretically possible (anything from hard to impossible</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/24921793/Wrong_characters_for_the_fight_What_should_be_expected?post_id=450932333#450932333</link><description>Our Group has blacklisted one of those mentioned in this thread. I personally wouldn't rate it as low as 'Something of Value' from LG but...Spoiler: &#xD; &#xD; Show&#xD; &#xD; Corm1-4. Yes the tactics make it theoretically possible (anything from hard to impossible</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:15:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I am suddenly reminded of the premiere of Living Greyhawk at Gen Con.There was one adventure that featured a were-rat.Quite a few tables had difficulty with the encounter and "you shouldn't be putting things with DR in a 1st level adventure!" was utt</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/24921793/Wrong_characters_for_the_fight_What_should_be_expected?post_id=450579981#450579981</link><description>I am suddenly reminded of the premiere of Living Greyhawk at Gen Con.There was one adventure that featured a were-rat.Quite a few tables had difficulty with the encounter and "you shouldn't be putting things with DR in a 1st level adventure!" was utt</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:05:16 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
